Back to Top Skip to main content

Program Integrity Office

The Program Integrity Office at the Defense Health Agency (DHA) in Aurora, Colorado is the central coordinating agency for allegations of fraud and abuse within the TRICARE program.

What is fraud and abuse?

  • Fraud is when a person or organization deliberately deceives others to gain some sort of unauthorized benefit.
  • Abuse is when providers supply services or products that are medically unnecessary or that do not meet professional standards.

You're an important partner in the ongoing fight against fraud and abuse. If you suspect anything out of the ordinary, you should report it!

And remember, no one from TRICARE will ever contact you to recommend a particular product or medicine. If are ever contacted on the phone or via email, don't share any personal information and report the incident immediately.

Report Health Care Fraud Request Customer Service

Frequently Asked Questions

View questions and answers about health care fraud and abuse.

Q1:

What does the term "TRICARE" stand for?

A:

TRICARE is the health care program for service members (active duty, Guard/Reserve, retired) and their families around the world. TRICARE is a major part of the Military Health System. >>Learn More about TRICARE

Q2:

What's wrong with a provider waiving the beneficiary's cost-share?

A:

The beneficiary's cost-share is established by law. It protects both the beneficiary and the government. When a beneficiary is responsible for paying part of the cost of the care, we have found there is more attention paid to the accuracy of the Explanation of Benefits. If the charge is inaccurate, the beneficiary is likely to report the discrepancy. Many fraud cases are initiated as a result of such reportings. The cost-share also helps protect the beneficiary. When a beneficiary is responsible for paying 20-25 percent of a $10,000 procedure, he/she is likely to get a second medical opinion to ensure the services are medically necessary and appropriate. Providers cannot waive cost-shares. It is an obligation imposed by Congress for valid reasons. Waiver of the cost-share under the new fraud amendments is treated as a fraudulent act with separate dollar penalties.

Q3:

What is a mutually-exclusive edit?

A:

This is billing for two procedures that are either physically impossible to perform at the same time (such as an abdominal hysterectomy and a vaginal hysterectomy) or are really duplicative. In laboratory billings, a mutually-exclusive billing might be laboratory tests that are billed at the same time when it is necessary to wait for the results of the first before the second test is requested. In U.S. vs. Pickett, an ultrasound for a complete fetal and maternal evaluation was billed in addition to a fetal biophysical profile, basically the same procedure.

Q4:

What is meant by the term "upcoding"?

A:

Upcoding is the practice of billing the services at a higher level than what was actually provided to obtain reimbursement at a higher rate.

Q5:

Is upcoding fraudulent?

A:

Upcoding is considered fraudulent in that it is a misrepresentation of the services provided.

Q6:

What are some examples of upcoding?

A:

One example is billing for a 30 minute session of individual psychotherapy (90843) as if 45-50 minutes were provided (90844). Another is providing group psychotherapy but billing for it as if it were individual psychotherapy. Since a group psychotherapy session generally involves 4-10 patients, and individual psychotherapy reimburses at the rate of approximately $100 per hour, misrepresenting the services could give the provider a financial windfall of $400-$1000 per hour. Other types of upcoding exist, such as providing a unilateral mammography but billing for it as if it were a bilateral mammography.

Q7:

Can upcoding exist with office and hospital visits?

A:

Upcoding can exist in the selection of the Evaluation and Management codes (99000 series) which are used for office and hospital visits. In 1992, the Physicians Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) was revised to include specific time elements for each level of visit, specific clinical examples and a definition of what the patient's condition should be if a higher level code is selected. There are 5 levels of office visits, for both new patients and established patients. The level of office visit is determined by the number of diagnoses, the complexity of the case, the risk of complications or morbidity and the complexity of the decision making--straight-forward, low, moderate or high.

Q8:

Doesn't the new fraud legislation address upcoding?

A:

Yes. It provides for a $10,000 fine per incidence of upcoding, and with the clarification in the CPT as of 1992, clear-cut parameters exist as to what level is the appropriate one to bill.

Q9:

Is "unbundling" or "code gaming" considered fraudulent?

A:

"Unbundling," "fragmenting" or "code gaming" in order to manipulate the CPT codes as a means of increasing reimbursement is considered a misrepresentation of the services rendered. Such a practice is considered fraudulent and abusive. In US vs Pickett, a radiologist was convicted in a criminal trial for billing for a consultation in addition to the diagnostic imaging procedure which included performing the test and its interpretation. This is a form of unbundling or double billing.

You also may be interested in...

Christine Larner Warren Sentenced

Publication
4/18/2000

Warren had previously pled guilty onJ anuary 21, 2000, to a criminal information charging her with conspiracy to commit health care fraud.

Recommended Content:

Fraud Alerts | Program Integrity

Dr. Brij K. Mittal Found Guilty

Publication
4/17/2000

Doctor Brij K. Mittal was found guilty of one count of conspiracy and three counts of the Antikickback Act after a three week long jury trial.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Civil Complaint Filed Against Owen McCarthy

Publication
4/17/2000

Complaint alleges that the McCarthys and their company filed false and fraudulent claims for reimbursement fromthe TRICARE program and Medicare for medical expenses related to treatment for surgical and non-surgical billing.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Sutherland and Kelly Charged with Filing False Claim

Publication
4/17/2000

John M.Sutherland and Morris Kelly were each charged with filing a false claim against the U.S. Government, in connection with health care claims made to TRICARE, Medicare and other health care programs.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Michael Anderson Charged

Publication
4/14/2000

Anderson charged with allegedly submitting two false statements to the Department of Defense, impersonation of an officer, and a convicted felon in possession of firearms and ammunition.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Dr. Herbert A. Daniels Charged

Publication
4/12/2000

Daniels charged charged in this 49-count indictment with health care fraud, mail fraud and money laundering, for allegedly submitting false and fraudulent clams to Government funded insurance programs including TRICARE, Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance companies.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Dr. William Liebman Charged

Publication
12/8/1999

Liebman charged with diluting child vaccines to the point that the patient may not have been effectively immunized against diseases like Hepatitis B, meningitis and whooping cough.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Richard J. Anderson Pleads Guilty

Publication
8/25/1999

Anderson pled guilty to one count of theft by swindle in excess of $35,000 and one count of medical assistance fraud in excess of $2,500.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts
<< < ... 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 
Showing results 136 - 143 Page 10 of 10

DHA Address: 7700 Arlington Boulevard | Suite 5101 | Falls Church, VA | 22042-5101

Some documents are presented in Portable Document Format (PDF). A PDF reader is required for viewing. Download a PDF Reader or learn more about PDFs.