Back to Top Skip to main content

Program Integrity Office

The Program Integrity Office at the Defense Health Agency (DHA) in Aurora, Colorado is the central coordinating agency for allegations of fraud and abuse within the TRICARE program.

What is fraud and abuse?

  • Fraud is when a person or organization deliberately deceives others to gain some sort of unauthorized benefit.
  • Abuse is when providers supply services or products that are medically unnecessary or that do not meet professional standards.

You're an important partner in the ongoing fight against fraud and abuse. If you suspect anything out of the ordinary, you should report it!

And remember, no one from TRICARE will ever contact you to recommend a particular product or medicine. If are ever contacted on the phone or via email, don't share any personal information and report the incident immediately.

Report Health Care Fraud Request Customer Service

Frequently Asked Questions

View questions and answers about health care fraud and abuse.

Q1:

What does the term "TRICARE" stand for?

A:

TRICARE is the health care program for service members (active duty, Guard/Reserve, retired) and their families around the world. TRICARE is a major part of the Military Health System. >>Learn More about TRICARE

Q2:

What's wrong with a provider waiving the beneficiary's cost-share?

A:

The beneficiary's cost-share is established by law. It protects both the beneficiary and the government. When a beneficiary is responsible for paying part of the cost of the care, we have found there is more attention paid to the accuracy of the Explanation of Benefits. If the charge is inaccurate, the beneficiary is likely to report the discrepancy. Many fraud cases are initiated as a result of such reportings. The cost-share also helps protect the beneficiary. When a beneficiary is responsible for paying 20-25 percent of a $10,000 procedure, he/she is likely to get a second medical opinion to ensure the services are medically necessary and appropriate. Providers cannot waive cost-shares. It is an obligation imposed by Congress for valid reasons. Waiver of the cost-share under the new fraud amendments is treated as a fraudulent act with separate dollar penalties.

Q3:

What is a mutually-exclusive edit?

A:

This is billing for two procedures that are either physically impossible to perform at the same time (such as an abdominal hysterectomy and a vaginal hysterectomy) or are really duplicative. In laboratory billings, a mutually-exclusive billing might be laboratory tests that are billed at the same time when it is necessary to wait for the results of the first before the second test is requested. In U.S. vs. Pickett, an ultrasound for a complete fetal and maternal evaluation was billed in addition to a fetal biophysical profile, basically the same procedure.

Q4:

What is meant by the term "upcoding"?

A:

Upcoding is the practice of billing the services at a higher level than what was actually provided to obtain reimbursement at a higher rate.

Q5:

Is upcoding fraudulent?

A:

Upcoding is considered fraudulent in that it is a misrepresentation of the services provided.

Q6:

What are some examples of upcoding?

A:

One example is billing for a 30 minute session of individual psychotherapy (90843) as if 45-50 minutes were provided (90844). Another is providing group psychotherapy but billing for it as if it were individual psychotherapy. Since a group psychotherapy session generally involves 4-10 patients, and individual psychotherapy reimburses at the rate of approximately $100 per hour, misrepresenting the services could give the provider a financial windfall of $400-$1000 per hour. Other types of upcoding exist, such as providing a unilateral mammography but billing for it as if it were a bilateral mammography.

Q7:

Can upcoding exist with office and hospital visits?

A:

Upcoding can exist in the selection of the Evaluation and Management codes (99000 series) which are used for office and hospital visits. In 1992, the Physicians Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) was revised to include specific time elements for each level of visit, specific clinical examples and a definition of what the patient's condition should be if a higher level code is selected. There are 5 levels of office visits, for both new patients and established patients. The level of office visit is determined by the number of diagnoses, the complexity of the case, the risk of complications or morbidity and the complexity of the decision making--straight-forward, low, moderate or high.

Q8:

Doesn't the new fraud legislation address upcoding?

A:

Yes. It provides for a $10,000 fine per incidence of upcoding, and with the clarification in the CPT as of 1992, clear-cut parameters exist as to what level is the appropriate one to bill.

Q9:

Is "unbundling" or "code gaming" considered fraudulent?

A:

"Unbundling," "fragmenting" or "code gaming" in order to manipulate the CPT codes as a means of increasing reimbursement is considered a misrepresentation of the services rendered. Such a practice is considered fraudulent and abusive. In US vs Pickett, a radiologist was convicted in a criminal trial for billing for a consultation in addition to the diagnostic imaging procedure which included performing the test and its interpretation. This is a form of unbundling or double billing.

You also may be interested in...

TRICARE's Program Integrity Office Battles Fraud

Publication
10/29/2007

Article from the TMA Public Affairs Offfice containing important information for beneficiaries about reporting fraud

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Aventis Pays More Than $190 Million to Settle Drug Pricing Fraud Matters

Publication
9/10/2007

Department of Justice press release regarding the Aventis Pharmaceutical settlement

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and Top Executives Plead Guilty to Misbranding Oxycotin; Will Pay Over $600 Million

Publication
5/10/2007

Press release from the Western District of Virginia United States Attorney announcing the settlement with Purdue Frederick regarding Oxycontin (MS Contin).

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Medical Identity Theft

Publication
3/1/2007

Article about protecting yourself and your TRICARE benefits.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Thomas Lutz Pleads Guilty

Publication
12/13/2006

United States Attorney's press release announcing Lutz' guilty plea

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Medical Identity Theft on the Rise

Publication
12/5/2006

How to protect yourself from having your personal and medical information stolen.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

The Effect of Exclusion From Participation in Federal Health Care Programs

Publication
11/3/2006

Special Advisory Bulletin from Health and Human Services about the effects of sanctioning providers

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Thomas Lutz and Health Visions Indictment

Publication
10/18/2006

The Department of Justise press release for the indictment of Thomas Lutz and Health Visions Corporation.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Waiving TRICARE Deductibles and Cost Shares Is Illegal

Publication
6/16/2006

Article regarding waiver of cost share

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Apachicola Physician Convicted on Drug and Fraud Charges

Publication
1/30/2006

Former Apachicola osteopathic physician convicted on wire fraud, health care fraud and distribution of controlled substances

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Bayview and Roxbury Pharmacy

Publication
8/8/2005

Mohammadali Abolahrar, 34, and Reza Abolahrar, 36, were found guilty of conspiracy and 20 counts of health care fraud

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Jose L. Lopez Pleas Guilty

Publication
3/3/2004

Jose L. Lopez, 53, of Quezon City, Republic of the Philippines, plead guilty to count 1 of the indictment for allegedly conspiring to submit false claims relating to a medical fraud scheme that targeted TRICARE

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Rufino E. Buyao Sentenced

Publication
1/15/2004

Rufino E. Buyao of Tayug, Pangasinan, Republic of the Philippines, was sentenced to 14 months in prison with three years of supervised release and ordered to pay $132,390.72 in restitution

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Rufino Buyao Pleas Guilty

Publication
1/15/2004

Rufino E. Buyao, 61, of Tayug, Pangasinan, Republic of the Philippines, plead guilty to Count 2 of the indictment returned by the grand jury

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Herman E. Wetsman, D.O., guilty plea

Publication
5/19/2003

Herman E. Wetsman, D.O. plead guilty to mail fraud charge

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts
<< < 1 2 3 4 5  ... > >> 
Showing results 16 - 30 Page 2 of 10

DHA Address: 7700 Arlington Boulevard | Suite 5101 | Falls Church, VA | 22042-5101

Some documents are presented in Portable Document Format (PDF). A PDF reader is required for viewing: Download a PDF Reader or learn more about PDFs.