Back to Top Skip to main content
Alert Arrow ALERT!!

There are emergency procedures in place for parts of world due to weather.

Get the latest information on emergency prescription refills and PCM referral waivers. 

Program Integrity Office

The Program Integrity Office at the Defense Health Agency (DHA) in Aurora, Colorado is the central coordinating agency for allegations of fraud and abuse within the TRICARE program.

What is fraud and abuse?

  • Fraud is when a person or organization deliberately deceives others to gain some sort of unauthorized benefit.
  • Abuse is when providers supply services or products that are medically unnecessary or that do not meet professional standards.

You're an important partner in the ongoing fight against fraud and abuse. If you suspect anything out of the ordinary, you should report it!

And remember, no one from TRICARE will ever contact you to recommend a particular product or medicine. If are ever contacted on the phone or via email, don't share any personal information and report the incident immediately.

Report Health Care Fraud Request Customer Service Self Disclosure Program

Frequently Asked Questions

View questions and answers about health care fraud and abuse.

Q1:

What does the term "TRICARE" stand for?

A:

TRICARE is the health care program for service members (active duty, Guard/Reserve, retired) and their families around the world. TRICARE is a major part of the Military Health System. >>Learn More about TRICARE

Q2:

What's wrong with a provider waiving the beneficiary's cost-share?

A:

The beneficiary's cost-share is established by law. It protects both the beneficiary and the government. When a beneficiary is responsible for paying part of the cost of the care, we have found there is more attention paid to the accuracy of the Explanation of Benefits. If the charge is inaccurate, the beneficiary is likely to report the discrepancy. Many fraud cases are initiated as a result of such reportings. The cost-share also helps protect the beneficiary. When a beneficiary is responsible for paying 20-25 percent of a $10,000 procedure, he/she is likely to get a second medical opinion to ensure the services are medically necessary and appropriate. Providers cannot waive cost-shares. It is an obligation imposed by Congress for valid reasons. Waiver of the cost-share under the new fraud amendments is treated as a fraudulent act with separate dollar penalties.

Q3:

What is a mutually-exclusive edit?

A:

This is billing for two procedures that are either physically impossible to perform at the same time (such as an abdominal hysterectomy and a vaginal hysterectomy) or are really duplicative. In laboratory billings, a mutually-exclusive billing might be laboratory tests that are billed at the same time when it is necessary to wait for the results of the first before the second test is requested. In U.S. vs. Pickett, an ultrasound for a complete fetal and maternal evaluation was billed in addition to a fetal biophysical profile, basically the same procedure.

Q4:

What is meant by the term "upcoding"?

A:

Upcoding is the practice of billing the services at a higher level than what was actually provided to obtain reimbursement at a higher rate.

Q5:

Is upcoding fraudulent?

A:

Upcoding is considered fraudulent in that it is a misrepresentation of the services provided.

Q6:

What are some examples of upcoding?

A:

One example is billing for a 30 minute session of individual psychotherapy (90843) as if 45-50 minutes were provided (90844). Another is providing group psychotherapy but billing for it as if it were individual psychotherapy. Since a group psychotherapy session generally involves 4-10 patients, and individual psychotherapy reimburses at the rate of approximately $100 per hour, misrepresenting the services could give the provider a financial windfall of $400-$1000 per hour. Other types of upcoding exist, such as providing a unilateral mammography but billing for it as if it were a bilateral mammography.

Q7:

Can upcoding exist with office and hospital visits?

A:

Upcoding can exist in the selection of the Evaluation and Management codes (99000 series) which are used for office and hospital visits. In 1992, the Physicians Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) was revised to include specific time elements for each level of visit, specific clinical examples and a definition of what the patient's condition should be if a higher level code is selected. There are 5 levels of office visits, for both new patients and established patients. The level of office visit is determined by the number of diagnoses, the complexity of the case, the risk of complications or morbidity and the complexity of the decision making—straight-forward, low, moderate or high.

Q8:

Doesn't the new fraud legislation address upcoding?

A:

Yes. It provides for a $10,000 fine per incidence of upcoding, and with the clarification in the CPT as of 1992, clear-cut parameters exist as to what level is the appropriate one to bill.

Q9:

Is "unbundling" or "code gaming" considered fraudulent?

A:

"Unbundling," "fragmenting" or "code gaming" in order to manipulate the CPT codes as a means of increasing reimbursement is considered a misrepresentation of the services rendered. Such a practice is considered fraudulent and abusive. In U.S. vs Pickett, a radiologist was convicted in a criminal trial for billing for a consultation in addition to the diagnostic imaging procedure which included performing the test and its interpretation. This is a form of unbundling or double billing.

You also may be interested in...

Chiu Lui agrees to pay $100,000

Publication
5/9/2003

Chui Lun Lui, also known as Alan Lui, a former military dentist agreed to pay $100,000 to the government in settlement of a case arising under the False Claims Act.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

TRICARE Operation Fraud Watch Tough On Health Care Abuse

Publication
3/17/2003

The Department of Defense is proud of its success tracking down and prosecuting health care providers who commit fraud and abuse within the Military Health System and TRICARE.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

William Lewis guilty plea

Publication
2/4/2002

William S. Lewis M.D., pled guilty in U.S. District Court, Bridgeport, CT to a 3-count information charging him with fraud and false statements relating to the filing of both corporate and personal tax returns

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

20-Count Indictment Against Susanne M. Allen

Publication
12/19/2001

Allen indicted for allegedly submitting false statements relating to health care benefit programs and health care fraud.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Bert Fish Medical Center Enters Agreement

Publication
12/14/2001

The terms of the agreement are that Bert Fish Medical Center, Inc. will pay the United States $293,334 and agrees to comply with the terms of a Corporate Integrity Agreement with the Department of Health and Human Services.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Settlement Reached with Nightime Pediatrics Clinic

Publication
12/12/2001

Settlement addresses allegations that Nightime defrauded Government health care insurance programs by submitting false claims

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Rick Robison Appears for Sentencing

Publication
11/27/2001

Robison sentenced to 6 months home detention, 36 months probation, a fine of $24,594.58, restitution of $7,503.48 and a special assessment of $100.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Owners Respiratory Druggist Sentenced

Publication
11/15/2001

These sentences followed the guilty pleas of RDI and Richard Powell on June 28,2001, to charges of healthcare fraud.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Scott Hildago Sentenced

Publication
11/14/2001

Scott Hildago, sales representative, Indigo Laser Corporation, a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary was sentenced to 5 years probation and a $100 special assessment.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Owner HealthWise Medical Rehabilitation Centers Sentenced

Publication
11/14/2001

Dr. Concessi was sentenced to 30 months incarceration for asingle count of health care fraud and 30 months incarceration for 23 counts of false claims related to health care fraud.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Eddy J Hack Sentenced

Publication
11/13/2001

Eddy J. Hack, ownerand operator of Oncology Solutions, also known as International Oncology Network, was sentenced to 3 years probation, a $500 fine and a $100 special assessment.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Lifeline Home Health Care Enters Settlement Agreement

Publication
10/26/2001

The investigation was based on a civil suit initially filed wherein, the complainant alleged that the Lifeline knowingly made false statements and false claims, for the purpose of defrauding the TRICARE and Medicare.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Rodolfo Racho Seguban Sentenced

Publication
10/18/2001

Seguban sentenced to six months incarceration followed by 3 years supervised probation.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Karla and Eversley Haswell Sentenced

Publication
10/17/2001

Karla and Eversley Haswell, former owners and operators of Valley Counseling, Colorado Springs, CO, were sentenced to 21 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Suman Dewan M.D. Sentenced

Publication
10/10/2001

Dewan was sentenced to 10 months confinement,36 months supervised release, ordered to pay a fine of $15,000 and a special assessment fee of $100

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts
<< < 1 2 3 4 5  ... > >> 
Showing results 31 - 45 Page 3 of 10

DHA Address: 7700 Arlington Boulevard | Suite 5101 | Falls Church, VA | 22042-5101

Some documents are presented in Portable Document Format (PDF). A PDF reader is required for viewing. Download a PDF Reader or learn more about PDFs.