Back to Top Skip to main content

Program Integrity Office

The Program Integrity Office at the Defense Health Agency (DHA) in Aurora, Colorado is the central coordinating agency for allegations of fraud and abuse within the TRICARE program.

What is fraud and abuse?

  • Fraud is when a person or organization deliberately deceives others to gain some sort of unauthorized benefit.
  • Abuse is when providers supply services or products that are medically unnecessary or that do not meet professional standards.

You're an important partner in the ongoing fight against fraud and abuse. If you suspect anything out of the ordinary, you should report it!

And remember, no one from TRICARE will ever contact you to recommend a particular product or medicine. If are ever contacted on the phone or via email, don't share any personal information and report the incident immediately.

Report Health Care Fraud Request Customer Service

Frequently Asked Questions

View questions and answers about health care fraud and abuse.

Q1:

What does the term "TRICARE" stand for?

A:

TRICARE is the health care program for service members (active duty, Guard/Reserve, retired) and their families around the world. TRICARE is a major part of the Military Health System. >>Learn More about TRICARE

Q2:

What's wrong with a provider waiving the beneficiary's cost-share?

A:

The beneficiary's cost-share is established by law. It protects both the beneficiary and the government. When a beneficiary is responsible for paying part of the cost of the care, we have found there is more attention paid to the accuracy of the Explanation of Benefits. If the charge is inaccurate, the beneficiary is likely to report the discrepancy. Many fraud cases are initiated as a result of such reportings. The cost-share also helps protect the beneficiary. When a beneficiary is responsible for paying 20-25 percent of a $10,000 procedure, he/she is likely to get a second medical opinion to ensure the services are medically necessary and appropriate. Providers cannot waive cost-shares. It is an obligation imposed by Congress for valid reasons. Waiver of the cost-share under the new fraud amendments is treated as a fraudulent act with separate dollar penalties.

Q3:

What is a mutually-exclusive edit?

A:

This is billing for two procedures that are either physically impossible to perform at the same time (such as an abdominal hysterectomy and a vaginal hysterectomy) or are really duplicative. In laboratory billings, a mutually-exclusive billing might be laboratory tests that are billed at the same time when it is necessary to wait for the results of the first before the second test is requested. In U.S. vs. Pickett, an ultrasound for a complete fetal and maternal evaluation was billed in addition to a fetal biophysical profile, basically the same procedure.

Q4:

What is meant by the term "upcoding"?

A:

Upcoding is the practice of billing the services at a higher level than what was actually provided to obtain reimbursement at a higher rate.

Q5:

Is upcoding fraudulent?

A:

Upcoding is considered fraudulent in that it is a misrepresentation of the services provided.

Q6:

What are some examples of upcoding?

A:

One example is billing for a 30 minute session of individual psychotherapy (90843) as if 45-50 minutes were provided (90844). Another is providing group psychotherapy but billing for it as if it were individual psychotherapy. Since a group psychotherapy session generally involves 4-10 patients, and individual psychotherapy reimburses at the rate of approximately $100 per hour, misrepresenting the services could give the provider a financial windfall of $400-$1000 per hour. Other types of upcoding exist, such as providing a unilateral mammography but billing for it as if it were a bilateral mammography.

Q7:

Can upcoding exist with office and hospital visits?

A:

Upcoding can exist in the selection of the Evaluation and Management codes (99000 series) which are used for office and hospital visits. In 1992, the Physicians Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) was revised to include specific time elements for each level of visit, specific clinical examples and a definition of what the patient's condition should be if a higher level code is selected. There are 5 levels of office visits, for both new patients and established patients. The level of office visit is determined by the number of diagnoses, the complexity of the case, the risk of complications or morbidity and the complexity of the decision making--straight-forward, low, moderate or high.

Q8:

Doesn't the new fraud legislation address upcoding?

A:

Yes. It provides for a $10,000 fine per incidence of upcoding, and with the clarification in the CPT as of 1992, clear-cut parameters exist as to what level is the appropriate one to bill.

Q9:

Is "unbundling" or "code gaming" considered fraudulent?

A:

"Unbundling," "fragmenting" or "code gaming" in order to manipulate the CPT codes as a means of increasing reimbursement is considered a misrepresentation of the services rendered. Such a practice is considered fraudulent and abusive. In US vs Pickett, a radiologist was convicted in a criminal trial for billing for a consultation in addition to the diagnostic imaging procedure which included performing the test and its interpretation. This is a form of unbundling or double billing.

You also may be interested in...

Dr. John A. Campa, III Pleads Guilty

Publication
4/17/2001

Campa was charged with 57 counts of mail fraud, 15 counts of healthcare fraud and 6 counts of false statements in connection with a health care matter.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Olstein Charged with Conspiracy to Defraud

Publication
4/11/2001

Dr. Joseph S. Olstein of charged with conspiracy to defraud federal health care programs and violation of the Anti-Kickback Act.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

11th Military Retiree Convicted In Ongoing Federal Investigation Of Health Care Fraud in the Philippines

Publication
4/1/2001

Peggy A. Lautenschlager, United States Attorney for the Western District of Wisconsin, announced today the eleventh federal conviction in the ongoing criminal investigation of CHAMPUS/TRICARE health care fraud in the Philippines.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Dr. Jose E. Grau Sentenced for Taking Kickbacks

Publication
3/27/2001

Dr. Jose E. Grau was sentenced in forc onspiring to defraud the TRICARE and Medicare health care programs by taking kickback payments

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Dr. Fred Leslie Sentenced for Taking Kickbacks

Publication
3/23/2001

Dr. Fred Leslie was sentenced in U.S. District Court for conspiring to defraud the TRICARE and Medicare health care programs by taking kickback payments

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Romulo D. Estoesta Sentenced

Publication
3/20/2001

Estoesta sentenced to 18 months incarceration followed by 3 years supervised release. Estoesta was also ordered to pay $192,383 in restitution and a $50 special assessment fee.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Dr. Russell Bufalino and Dr. Robert Hartzel Sentenced

Publication
3/16/2001

Sentences were based on guilty pleas for conspiring to defraud the TRICARE and Medicare health care programs by making or receiving kickback payments for patient referrals.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Steven Carl Bradley and Robert Todd Willis Sentenced

Publication
3/15/2001

Federal grand jury returned a 10 count indictment charging Bradley and Willis with mail fraud and conspiracy to commit mail fraud.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Dr John O Donnell Sentenced

Publication
3/5/2001

Dr. John O’Donnell was sentenced to 78 months imprisonment to be followed by three years supervised release, $688,277 in restitution and a $2600 special assessment.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Indictment Against Dr. Forrest H. Braack

Publication
3/1/2001

Braack was charged in the 24-count indictment with 12 counts of health care fraud and 12 counts of making false applications for payments to Medicaid.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Romualdo Nisaya Garcia Arrested in Philippines

Publication
2/3/2001

The Office of the Inspector General (OIG), Department of Defense (DoD), announced today that on February 3, 2001, Romualdo Nisaya Garcia was arrested in the Republic of the Philippines for allegedly committing mail fraud and submitting false claims to the U. S. Government.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Settlement Reached with Genesee Valley Cardiothoracic Group

Publication
2/1/2001

The Office of the Inspector General (OIG), Department ofDefense (DOD), announced today that on February 1, 2001, a CivilFalse Claims Act and administrative settlement was reached between the United States Attorney’s Office (USAO), Western District of New York (WDNY) and the Genesee Valley Cardiothoracic Group (GVCG), Rochester, NY. The two million ...

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Rogelio Taaca Rosario Sentenced

Publication
1/30/2001

Rosario was sentenced to 12 months and a day incarceration, followed by 3-year supervised release, ordered to pay $183,556 in restitution and ordered to pay a $50 special assessment fee.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Aurelio P. Jimenez, D.P.M., Pleads Guilty to Mail fraud, Offorfeiture and Criminal Contempt

Publication
1/26/2001

The Office of the Inspector General (OIG), Department ofDefense (DoD), announced today that on January 26, 2001, AurelioP. Jimenez, D.P.M., owner of Kokomo Podiatry Clinic, Kokomo, IN,pleaded guilty to six-counts of mail fraud, one-count offorfeiture and one-count of criminal contempt.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts

Columbia Homecare Group Pleaded Guilty

Publication
1/25/2001

Columbia Homecare Group pleaded guilty for conspiracy, paying and receiving kickbacks and false statements with respect to U.S. Government medical cost reimbursement programs.

Recommended Content:

Program Integrity | Fraud Alerts
<< < ... 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 
Showing results 76 - 90 Page 6 of 10

DHA Address: 7700 Arlington Boulevard | Suite 5101 | Falls Church, VA | 22042-5101

Some documents are presented in Portable Document Format (PDF). A PDF reader is required for viewing: Download a PDF Reader or learn more about PDFs.