Skip to main content

Military Health System

Zika Virus Surveillance in Active Duty U.S. Military and Dependents Through the Naval Infectious Diseases Diagnostic Laboratory

Image of Anopheles merus mosquito. (CDC photo by James Gathany). Anopheles merus mosquito. (CDC photo by James Gathany)

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Abstract

The Naval Infectious Diseases Diagnostic Laboratory (NIDDL) serves as a reference clinical laboratory that supports Department of Defense (DOD) military treatment facilities worldwide in the detection and identification of high-risk and emerging infectious diseases. Since the emergence of Zika virus (ZIKV) in the Western Hemisphere in 2016, the NIDDL has been a central hub for ZIKV testing for DOD personnel and beneficiaries. Samples collected during patients’ clinical evaluations were screened for evidence of possible exposure to ZIKV using molecular and serological methods. An in-house ZIKV plaque reduction neutralization test was used to confirm the presence of ZIKV immunoglobulin M antibody. Of 1,420 individuals tested, ZIKV infection was confirmed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay in 11 (0.8%); an additional 26 recent flaviviral infections (possibly ZIKV) were identified based on serology (1.8%). These findings contribute to the understanding of the burden of ZIKV infections among DoD personnel and beneficiaries and highlight the role of the NIDDL in clinical diagnosis during emerging infectious disease outbreaks.

What are the new findings? 

In 2016–2017, the NIDDL tested samples from 1,420 individuals and confirmed 11 cases of ZIKV infection by PCR assay and 26 flavivirus infections (possibly ZIKV) by serology. This report highlights the role of the NIDDL in clinical diagnosis during emerging infectious disease outbreaks and in understanding the burden of ZIKV infections within the DOD.

What is the impact on readiness and force health protection?

The NIDDL provides valuable information to characterize the burden of emerging diseases in U.S. military personnel and DoD beneficiaries, to inform risk assessments, and to guide diagnostics and countermeasure development. Given the low percentage of symptomatic cases among those infected, future serological studies should be undertaken to better determine the actual infection rates among U.S. military personnel.

Backgound

In 1947, Zika virus (ZIKV) was first discovered in the Zika Forest, Uganda, in the blood of a rhesus monkey.1 The following year, ZIKV was isolated from Aedes africanus mosquitoes.2,3 ZIKV is a member of the Flavivirus genus, which also includes dengue viruses, yellow fever virus, and West Nile virus. The first known human case of ZIKV infection was in 1953 in Nigeria.4 Although serosurveys found anti-ZIKV antibodies in people throughout Africa, India, and Southeast Asia,5 for more than 50 years after initial discovery, documented human cases of acute ZIKV infection were rare. Large numbers of human cases were not observed until 2007, when an outbreak occurred in Micronesia.6 Other outbreaks in the Pacific Ocean region followed, starting in 2013 in French Polynesia,7 with subsequent emergence in New Caledonia and American Samoa, among other locations.8 ZIKV was unknown in the Western Hemisphere until 2015, when ZIKV emerged in Brazil and rapidly spread across the country.

ZIKV is transmitted to humans most commonly through the bites of infected Aedes mosquitoes, but instances of sexual transmission have also been reported. ZIKV usually causes a mild disease with symptoms lasting about 1 week that may include low-grade fever, rash, arthralgia, arthritis, myalgia, headache, conjunctivitis, and edema. Severe cases involving hospitalization are uncommon and deaths are rare.9,10 In recent years, an increase in neurological complications has been associated with ZIKV infection.3,11,12 Following the 2015 Zika outbreak in Brazil, there was a dramatic increase in the number of babies with microcephaly born to mothers who had experienced ZIKV infections.3,11,12 On 1 February 2016, the World Health Organization declared the ZIKV outbreak a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern.”12 ZIKV became a growing concern to the U.S. military because of increased ZIKV transmission in the Western Hemisphere, an association between ZIKV infection and microcephaly and other birth defects, and a potential for sexual transmission.

In response, the Naval Infectious Diseases Diagnostic Laboratory (NIDDL),13 with the assistance of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),14 provided support to military treatment facilities (MTFs) in testing patients for ZIKV and other arboviruses (e.g., dengue virus [DENV] and chikungunya virus [CHIKV]) in returning military travelers and their beneficiaries. The NIDDL is certified by the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) program, is accredited by the College of American Pathologists (CAP), and serves as a clinical reference laboratory specializing in the detection and identification of high-risk and emerging infectious diseases for clinicians at U.S. military healthcare facilities. This report summarizes laboratory testing at the NIDDL over the course of the ZIKV epidemic (29 January 2016 through 31 December 2017) and provides context for the NIDDL’s role in diagnostic testing for the Department of Defense (DOD) during emerging disease outbreaks.

Methods

Population and inclusion criteria

An algorithm14 for recommended ZIKV testing was provided to healthcare practitioners at MTFs.13 The algorithm included criteria for testing of individuals with Zika-like illness and travel history to endemic regions, individuals with Zika-like illness and possible sexual exposure with or without travel history, asymptomatic pregnant women with possible ZIKV exposure, and neonates with or without microcephaly with potential ZIKV exposure. However, healthcare providers often sent samples from asymptomatic men and non-pregnant women who had traveled to ZIKV-affected areas and who were concerned about infection. Therefore, testing was performed on serum or urine collected from patients based on travel to ZIKV high-risk areas, sexual contact with a partner who had traveled to a ZIKV high-risk area (especially for pregnant women), or symptoms possibly indicative of ZIKV infection associated with travel. Seventy-four MTFs sent samples, most of which were from patients with either possible sexual or travel exposure. One hundred seventy-nine samples with either no reported exposure or with no data regarding exposure or symptoms were submitted to the NIDDL. 

Specimens

Zika genomic material can be found in bodily fluids, such as semen, urine, breast milk, saliva, and amniotic fluid.15 ZIKV persists longer in urine (up to approximately 14 days) than it does in blood.16,17 Based on the CDC guidelines, the healthcare facilities were instructed to send both urine and serum for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing.14 All samples (serum and/or urine) were collected as part of routine clinical care when a patient visited an MTF to see a healthcare practitioner for acute care, routine screenings, or for other concerns. Samples were sent to the NIDDL for reference laboratory support during the ZIKV epidemic. Data for most samples were collected from manual logs submitted with the samples or from the Composite Health Care System, a database used by the Military Health System (MHS) to document patients’ health information and history, electronically order laboratory and radiology tests/services, retrieve test results, and order and prescribe medications. The submitting MTFs were asked to provide the following information: patient demographics, date of exposure, geographic region of exposure or region of travel for sexual partner, symptoms and time of onset, pregnancy status, and trimester of exposure. However, not all data fields were complete with each submission. All data used in preparing this report were de-identified following release of clinical results to the ordering physician.

Laboratory testing

In the laboratory, total nucleic acid was extracted from samples using an automated system, the QIAGEN EZ1 Advanced XL with the EZ1 DSP Virus Kit (QIAGEN, Germantown, MD). Serum and urine collected from suspected ZIKV-infected patients were tested using the Trioplex quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)16 assay for multiplex detection of ZIKV, DENV, and CHIKV on the Applied Biosystems (ABI) 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR Instrument using the SuperScriptTM III PlatinumTM One-Step qRT-PCR Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA).

In line with established standards, all sera were tested using the ZIKV immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ZIKV MAC-ELISA). The primers and probes for Trioplex qRT-PCR16 and ZIKV MAC-ELISA antigens18 were provided by the CDC arbovirus laboratory through the Laboratory Response Network (LRN). Plate controls were interpreted and results were reported as presumptive positive, equivocal, negative, or inconclusive (i.e., results uninterpretable because of high background optical density [OD]) (Figure). The specimen P/N value, which is the ratio of the specimen mean OD value when reacted with ZIKV antigen (P) to the calibrator (negative control sera) mean OD value when reacted with ZIKV antigen (N), was calculated. A specimen P/N value <2 was interpreted as negative and no further testing or analysis was necessary. If the specimen P/N value was =2, then the background P/N value was assessed. The background P/N value is the ratio of the specimen mean OD value when reacted with ZIKV antigen (P) to the specimen mean OD value when reacted with Vero (negative) antigen (N). Both the specimen P/N value and the background P/N value must be =2 for the plate and specimens to be considered valid. The samples were deemed equivocal if the ratio was =2.0 P/N <3.0 or presumptive positive if the ratio was P/N =3.0. If the P/N value was =2 but the background value was <2, the specimen was deemed inconclusive. Inconclusive samples were re-tested and, if possible, another serum sample was requested from the submitting MTFs.

All inconclusive, equivocal, and presumptive positive specimens were referred to the in-house ZIKV plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT).19 A low passage of ZIKV strain PRVABC59 was used to detect neutralizing antibody to ZIKV. The ZIKV PRNT titer is the reciprocal of the last serum dilution to show 90% plaque reduction. The cutoff dilution for positivity for PRNT was set at 1:10 as recommended in the CDC guidance for Zika testing.14 The PRNT is more specific than many other serological tests for the diagnosis of some viruses.20 To ensure quality of all results, CDC provided and evaluated the proficiency testing as well as the protocols for all 3 assays.

Although the CDC laboratory criteria for diagnosis of ZIKV infection21 includes ruling out DENV infection by PRNT, DENV PRNT was not established in the NIDDL and thus was not performed. We adopted a modified version of the CDC laboratory definition. Confirmed “recent ZIKV infection” was defined based on detection of viral ribonucleic acid (using the Trioplex qRT-PCR). “Recent Flavivirus infection, possible ZIKV” was defined as positive ZIKV IgM with positive ZIKV neutralizing antibody titers. In some cases, samples were sent to the CDC for DENV PRNT testing when requested by the clinician for clarification of results and patient management.

Analysis

Data were manually entered into a Microsoft Access database (2013, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA). Data cleaning and extraction were performed using Microsoft Excel 2013 (2013, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA) and R, version 3.2.1 (2015, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Data were analyzed using a combination of R, version 3.2.1, and Stata, version 13.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX).

Results

Between 29 January 2016 and 31 December 2017, samples from 1,420 individuals were received from DOD medical facilities around the world, including the U.S., Japan, Germany, Cuba, Guam, Spain, and Italy (Table 1). Four hundred and twelve of these individuals had clinical symptoms consistent with ZIKV infection, 852 were asymptomatic but with epidemiologic linkage to ZIKV cases, and 179 had either no reported exposure to ZIKV or no data regarding exposure or symptoms. There were 1,361 samples that included information on sex, 1,330 that included information on age, and 1,241 that included information on whether the patient was symptomatic or asymptomatic. In light of concerns for impact on fetal development, the majority of samples tested were from females (961/1,361; 70.6%; Table 2). The median age was 30 years (0–80 years); the majority (1,161/1,330; 87.3%) were between the ages of 18 and 40 years (data not shown).

Of the samples that included information on symptom status of the individual, (n=1,241; 87.8%), 389 (31.3%) were categorized as having come from symptomatic patients and 852 (68.7%) were categorized as having come from asymptomatic patients (data not shown). Of the samples identified as having come from symptomatic patients and that included information on travel to endemic regions (n=329), nearly all were associated with recent travel to endemic regions (n=314/329; 95.4%) or travel as well as potential sexual exposure (n=11/329; 3.3%). However, 2 (0.6%) of the samples were from newborns with reported ZIKV-infected mothers and 2 (0.6%) were from females without recent travel but with sexual contact with partners recently returning from endemic regions (data not shown). Of the samples from asymptomatic individuals that included information on travel (n=784), 615 (78.4%) were associated with recent travel to endemic regions, 120 (15.3%) were associated with sexual contact with a partner with recent travel history, 45 (5.7%) were associated with potential travel and sexual exposure, and 4 (0.5%) were associated with potential congenital exposure (data not shown).

Samples were received from 413 pregnant women; 23 (5.6%) of the women were symptomatic and 390 (94.4%) were asymptomatic (Table 2). Of the patients who were asymptomatic and pregnant, testing was indicated because of geographical exposure such as travel to or living in endemic regions (n=239; 70.3%), sexual contact with potential ZIKV-infected partners (n=73; 21.5%), or both (n=28; 8.2%).

Overall, individuals with reported potential travel exposure (n=985), including travel and sexual exposure, reported having visited or lived in Central America or the Caribbean (n=466; 47.3%), the Asia-Pacific region (n=246; 25.0%), South America (n=59; 6.0%), Africa (n=44; 4.5%), and/or potentially endemic regions of the U.S. (n=132; 13.4%); 57 individuals had no travel location provided (data not shown).

A variety of samples (n=1,948) from the 1,420 patients were submitted for testing, including, but not limited to, serum (n=891); serum and urine (n=500); serum and whole blood (n=15); serum, whole blood, and urine (n=5); urine only (n=4); semen and urine (n=1); semen, urine, and sputum (n=1); and semen only (n=1) (data not shown). For some patients, multiple samples were received, and for others, just 1 sample was received. Serum samples were tested using Zika MAC-ELISA, PRNT, and the CDC Trioplex qRT-PCR assay, whereas urine and semen samples were tested with the CDC Trioplex qRT-PCR assay only. Out of the 1,299 individuals tested using Trioplex qRT-PCR, there were 11 ZIKV-positive individuals (0.8%) (4 positive in serum, 6 in urine, and 1 in both sample types) and 8 (0.6%) DENV-positive individuals (3 positive in serum and 5 positive in both serum and urine) (Table 3). None of the samples tested were positive for CHIKV (Table 3). Among the 11 samples that were qRT-PCR-positive for ZIKV, 8 came from symptomatic patients, of whom 5 had travel histories to endemic locations in the Western Hemisphere (i.e., Puerto Rico, Mexico, or Bonaire) and 1 had been to the Philippines (Table 4). Travel histories were not available for the other 2 symptomatic individuals with ZIKV-positive samples (Table 4). The remaining 3 ZIKV-positive samples lacked information on symptom status and travel history.

Serum samples from 1,409 individuals were screened by Zika MAC-ELISA (Table 3). Of these, 56 were classified as presumptive positive, 44 were equivocal, 1,278 were negative, and 31 were inconclusive. All positive, equivocal, or inconclusive samples were analyzed by Zika PRNT for confirmation. Among Zika IgM-positive samples, 52% (29/56) were PRNT positive; among equivocal or inconclusive only samples, 4% (3/75) were PRNT-positive. Excluding the serology results from qRT-PCR-confirmed ZIKV and DENV infections, serological testing resulted in 26 individuals classified as “Recent Flavivirus infection, possible ZIKV.” Eleven of these individuals were symptomatic, 11 were asymptomatic, and 4 had no history provided. Therefore, combining molecular and serological testing, a total of 37 individuals had laboratory results consistent with recent ZIKV infection: 11 confirmed and 26 possible recent ZIKV infections (Table 3).

Of the 413 pregnant women screened, 8 (1.9%) were considered to have recent flavivirus, possible ZIKV infections by Zika MAC-ELISA with PRNT confirmation. One was symptomatic. All 8 ZIKV-positive pregnant women reported recent travel to ZIKV-endemic areas, including Puerto Rico, the Philippines, and Brazil, and therefore mosquito transmission during travel rather than sexual contact was considered the likely route of exposure (data not shown).

Additionally, 9 infants were tested for recent ZIKV infection, including 3 with reported microcephaly. None of the 3 infants with reported microcephaly tested positive for ZIKV by any of the tests. One infant without reported microcephaly tested inconclusive by Zika MAC-ELISA but was positive by PRNT, most likely due to circulating maternal antibody to ZIKV; the infant’s mother reported recent travel to Puerto Rico (data not shown) and also tested positive by Trioplex qRT-PCR, MAC-ELISA, and PRNT.

Editorial Comment

Starting in January of 2016, the NIDDL provided support to MTFs by testing for ZIKV and other arboviruses (DENV and CHIKV) in returning military travelers and their beneficiaries. Following the realization that ZIKV can be transmitted sexually, the NIDDL began screening females of childbearing age and those reporting pregnancy after sexual contact with a member “exposed” or symptomatic following travel to a region with ZIKV risk. 

The NIDDL is a CLIA-certified and CAP-accredited infectious disease laboratory that serves multiple roles within the DOD, from clinical diagnostic laboratory to reference laboratory for the detection and identification of high-risk emerging infectious diseases even during large outbreaks. In addition, the NIDDL maintains a repository of samples for assay development and quality assurance. The NIDDL partners with CDC and the LRN to support surveillance studies of emerging infections among DOD personnel.

ZIKV poses a challenge for laboratory confirmation. Infection is often asymptomatic, and even symptomatic cases are characterized by low-grade undifferentiated febrile illness that is difficult to distinguish from illness caused by other co-circulating pathogens, such as DENV, CHIKV, rickettsial pathogens, and malaria. Serological confirmation is particularly challenging because of cross-reaction with other flavivirus antibodies, particularly DENV. The NIDDL provides diagnostic confirmation, not only using molecular methods such as qRT-PCR, but also ELISA with follow-up diagnostic PRNT confirmation.

The NIDDL experienced several challenges during the current study. First, testing guidelines were disseminated to healthcare practitioners, but they were not always followed. For example, many samples were submitted from asymptomatic men and asymptomatic non-pregnant women without any travel history or other risk factors, including sexual contact with a symptomatic partner who had traveled to a high-risk location. In addition, there were occasional instances of broken containers or samples that leaked during shipment as well as the submission of incorrect orders. Finally, patient travel/sexual history was missing for different subsets of samples. Despite these challenges, the NIDDL successfully tested all of the received samples, reported the results to the requesting facility, and reported results to CDC through the LRN messenger system.

The current study identified 37 confirmed and possible ZIKV infections (2.6%), including 19 symptomatic infections. The ZIKV infections reported here represent a subset of all cases reported across the MHS. Poss and colleagues22 reported 156 confirmed cases between January and November 2016, including 5 in pregnant beneficiaries. Those reported cases were nearly all symptomatic, whereas the current study detected a number of asymptomatic infections among individuals with travel exposure to endemic regions. Given that the majority of ZIKV infections are asymptomatic or at least subclinical,23 incidence rates among military personnel will be largely undercounted, as predominantly symptomatic cases will be reported. Additionally, 8 pregnant women tested positive for ZIKV (1.9% of all pregnant women tested), all by Zika MAC-ELISA and PRNT serology. Exposure through travel, rather than sexual exposure, was likely responsible for all of these infections.

DOD personnel represent a unique population in many ways since they are deployed globally, often in austere environments, and thus are exposed to locally circulating pathogens. The NIDDL provides valuable information to characterize the burden of emerging diseases in U.S. military personnel and DOD beneficiaries, inform risk assessments, and guide diagnostics and countermeasure development. Because of the sequelae of Zika, an urgent need exists for a vaccine. There are a variety of ZIKV vaccines currently in development that employ a range of technologies and approaches (e.g., inactivated ZIKV, protein nanoparticle, synthetic peptide, DNAbased, virus-like particle, thermostable mRNA-based, live modified vaccinia virus Ankara, recombinant protein vaccines, and self-amplifying mRNA platform).15 However, the vaccine must elicit protective immunity regardless of mode of transmission, be free of neurological side effects, and protect healthy adults, young children, pregnant women, and unborn fetuses.15 Assessment of clinical efficacy when the majority of ZIKV infections are asymptomatic poses an additional challenge.15 

Future work will involve sequencing of ZIKV isolates and looking for linkages between them, as the women were infected in a variety of locations, including the Caribbean, South America, and Asia. The NIDDL will also develop and validate a DENV PRNT assay to assess cross-reactivity and verify the presence of ZIKV antibodies. Additional work is needed to determine if pathogenesis of the organism varies in relation to sexual transmission when compared to vector-borne transmission. Control of mosquito populations is imperative to prevent further spreading of the organism. Moreover, in light of the low percentage of symptomatic cases among those infected, future cross-sectional serological studies should be undertaken to better determine the actual infection rates among U.S. military personnel.

Author affiliations: Naval Infectious Diseases Diagnostic Laboratory, Viral and Rickettsial Diseases Department, Infectious Diseases Directorate, U.S. Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, MD (Mr. Sugiharto, Ms. Widjaja, CDR Williams, and LCDR Simons); U.S. Food and Drug Administration (CDR Myers); Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch, Silver Spring, MD (Ms. Hartman); Cherokee Nation Technologies, Silver Spring, MD (Ms. Hartman)

Acknowledgments: The authors thank Dr. Brett Forshey (Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch) for reviewing and editing the manuscript and for his database analysis contribution. Funding for this study was provided by the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch and its Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response section.

References

1. Dick GW, Kitchen SF, Haddow AJ. Zika virus. I. Isolations and serological specificity. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1952;46(5):509–520.

2. Song BH, Yun SI, Woolley M, Lee YM. Zika virus: history, epidemiology, transmission, and clinical presentation. J Neuroimmunol. 2017;308:50–64.

3. Rasmussen SA, Jamieson DJ, Honein MA, Petersen LR. Zika virus and birth defects—reviewing the evidence for causality. New Engl J Med. 2016;374(20):1981–1987.

4. Macnamara FN. Zika virus: a report on three cases of human infection during an epidemic of jaundice in Nigeria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1954;48(2):139–145.

5. Lessler J, Chaisson LH, Kucirka LM, et al. Assessing the global threat from Zika virus. Science. 2016;353(6300):aaf8160.

6. Duffy MR, Chen TH, Hancock WT, et al. Zika virus outbreak on Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia. New Engl J Med. 2009;360(24):2536–2543.

7. Cao-Lormeau VM, Roche C, Teissier A, et al. Zika virus, French Polynesia, South Pacific, 2013. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(6):1085–1086.

8. Petersen LR, Jamieson DJ, Honein MA. Zika Virus. New Engl J Med. 2016;375(3):294–295.

9. Paixao ES, Barreto F, Teixeira Mda G, Costa Mda C, Rodrigues LC. History, epidemiology, and clinical manifestations of Zika: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(4):606–612.

10. Chang C, Ortiz K, Ansari A, Gershwin ME. The Zika outbreak of the 21st century. J Autoimmun. 2016;68:1–13.

11. Wikan N, Smith DR. Zika virus: history of a newly emerging arbovirus. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(7):e119–e126.

12. World Health Organization. WHO Director-General summarizes the outcome of the Emergency Committee regarding clusters of microcephaly and Guillain-Barré syndrome. 1 February 1 2016. https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/01-02-2016-whodirector-general-summarizes-the-outcome-of-theemergency-committee-regarding-clusters-of-microcephaly-and-guillain-barr%C3%A9-syndrome. Accessed 31 January 2018.

13. Naval Infectious Disease Diagnostic Laboratory. Interim Zika Virus Testing Criteria. http://www.med.navy.mil/sites/nmrc/SiteAssets/Interim%20Zika%20Virus%20Testing%20Criteria.pdf. Accessed 9 April 2018.

14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated Guidance for US Laboratories Testing for Zika Virus Infection. https://www.cdc.gov/zika/laboratories/lab-guidance.html. Accessed 13 May 2019.

15. Poland GA, Kennedy RB, Ovsyannikova IG, Palacios R, Ho PL, Kalil J. Development of vaccines against Zika virus. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(7):e211–e219.

16. Centers for Disease Control. Trioplex Realtime RT-PCR Assay. 6 April 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/zika/pdfs/trioplex-real-time-rt-pcr-assay-instructions-for-use.pdf. Accessed 31 January 2018.

17. Gourinat AC, O'Connor O, Calvez E, Goarant C, Dupont-Rouzeyrol M. Detection of Zika virus in urine. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(1):84–86.

18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Zika MAC-ELISA. 3 May 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/zika/pdfs/zika-mac-elisa-instructions-for-use.pdf. Accessed 31 January 2018.

19. Rabe IB, Staples JE, Villanueva J, et al. Interim guidance for interpretation of Zika virus antibody test results. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(21):543–546.

20. Shan C, Xie X, Ren P, et al. A rapid Zika diagnostic assay to measure neutralizing antibodies in patients. EBioMedicine. 2017;17:157–162.

21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Zika Virus Disease and Zika Virus Infection, 2016 Case Definition, Approved June 2016. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nndss/conditions/zika/case-definition/2016/06/. Accessed 9 April 2018.

22. Poss DE, Writer JV, Harris S. Zika virus infections in Military Health System beneficiaries since the introduction of the virus in the Western Hemisphere, 1 January 2016 through 30 November 2016. MSMR. 2016;23(12):7–11.

23. Shuaib W, Stanazai H, Abazid AG, Mattar AA. Re-emergence of Zika virus: a review on pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Am J Med. 2016;129(8): 879.

Process flow chart of analysis of Zika virus MAC-ELISA data

Most common referring institutions

Participant demographics (n=1,420)

Laboratory results

ZIKV RT-PCR-positive individuals

You also may be interested in...

MSMR Vol. 29 No. 07 - July 2022

Report
7/1/2022

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Surveillance trends for SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens among U.S. Military Health System Beneficiaries, Sept. 27, 2020 – Oct. 2,2021; Establishment of SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance within the MHS during March 1 – Dec. 31 2020; Suicide behavior among heterosexual, lesbian/gay, and bisexual active component service members in the U.S. Armed Forces; Brief report: Phase I results using the Virtual Pooled Registry Cancer Linkage system (VPR-CLS) for military cancer surveillance.

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness & Combat Support | Public Health | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Morbidity Burdens Attributable to Various Illnesses and Injuries, Deployed Active and Reserve Component Service Members, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

Article
6/1/2022
Morbidity Burdens Attributable to Various Illnesses and Injuries, Deployed Active and Reserve Component Service Members, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

As in previous years, among service members deployed during 2021, injury/poisoning, musculoskeletal diseases and signs/symptoms accounted for more than half of the total health care burden during deployment. Compared to garrison disease burden, deployed service members had relatively higher proportions of encounters for respiratory infections, skin diseases, and infectious and parasitic diseases. The recent marked increase in the percentage of total medical encounters attributable to the ICD diagnostic category "other" (23.0% in 2017 to 44.4% in 2021) is likely due to increases in diagnostic testing and immunization associated with the response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Absolute and Relative Morbidity Burdens Attributable to Various Illnesses and Injuries, Non-service Member Beneficiaries of the Military Health System, 2021

Article
6/1/2022
Absolute and Relative Morbidity Burdens Attributable to Various Illnesses and Injuries, Non-service Member Beneficiaries of the Military Health System, 2021

In 2021, mental health disorders accounted for the largest proportions of the morbidity and health care burdens that affected the pediatric and younger adult beneficiary age groups. Among adults aged 45–64 and those aged 65 or older, musculoskeletal diseases accounted for the most morbidity and health care burdens. As in previous years, this report documents a substantial majority of non-service member beneficiaries received care for current illness and injury from the Military Health System as outsourced services at non-military medical facilities.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Hospitalizations, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

Article
6/1/2022
Hospitalizations, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

The hospitalization rate in 2021 was 48.0 per 1,000 person-years (p-yrs), the second lowest rate of the most recent 10 years. For hospitalizations limited to military facilities, the rate in 2021 was the lowest for the entire period. As in prior years, the majority (71.2%) of hospitalizations were associated with diagnoses in the categories of mental health disorders, pregnancy-related conditions, injury/poisoning, and digestive system disorders.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Surveillance snapshot: Illness and injury burdens, reserve component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

Article
6/1/2022
Surveillance snapshot: Illness and injury burdens, reserve component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Absolute and Relative Morbidity Burdens Attributable to Various Illnesses and Injuries, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

Article
6/1/2022
Absolute and Relative Morbidity Burdens Attributable to Various Illnesses and Injuries, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

In 2021, as in prior years, the medical conditions associated with the most medical encounters, the largest number of affected service members, and the greatest number of hospital days were in the major categories of injuries, musculoskeletal disorders, and mental health disorders. Despite the pandemic, COVID-19 accounted for less than 2% of total medical encounters and bed days in active component service members.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Medical Evacuations out of the U.S. Central and U.S. Africa Commands, Active and Reserve Components, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

Article
6/1/2022
Medical Evacuations out of the U.S. Central and U.S. Africa Commands, Active and Reserve Components, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

The proportions of evacuations out of USCENTCOM that were due to battle injuries declined substantially in 2021. For USCENTCOM, evacuations for mental health disorders were the most common, followed by non-battle injury and poisoning, and signs, symptoms, and ill-defined conditions. For USAFRICOM, evacuations for non-battle injury and poisoning were most common, followed by disorders of the digestive system and mental health disorders.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Surveillance snapshot: Illness and injury burdens, recruit trainees, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

Article
6/1/2022
Surveillance snapshot: Illness and injury burdens, recruit trainees, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Ambulatory Visits, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

Article
6/1/2022
Ambulatory Visits, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

In 2021, the overall numbers and rates of active component service member ambulatory care visits were the highest of any of the last 10 years. Most categories of illness and injury showed modest increases in numbers and rates. The proportions of ambulatory care visits that were accomplished via telehealth encounters fell to under 15% in 2021, compared to 19% in 2020.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Surveillance Snapshot: Tick-borne Encephalitis in Military Health System Beneficiaries, 2012–2021

Article
5/1/2022
iStock—The castor bean tick (Ixoedes ricinus). Credit: Erik Karits

Tick-borne Encephalitis in Military Health System Beneficiaries, 2012–2021. Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is a viral infection of the central nervous system that is transmitted by the bite of infected ticks, mostly found in wooded habitats in parts of Europe and Asia

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

The Association Between Two Bogus Items, Demographics, and Military Characteristics in a 2019 Cross-sectional Survey of U.S. Army Soldiers

Article
5/1/2022
NIANTIC, CT, UNITED STATES 06.16.2022 U.S. Army Staff Sgt. John Young, an information technology specialist assigned to Joint Forces Headquarters, Connecticut Army National Guard, works on a computer at Camp Nett, Niantic, Connecticut, June 16, 2022. Young provided threat intelligence to cyber analysts that were part of his "Blue Team" during Cyber Yankee, a cyber training exercise meant to simulate a real world environment to train mission essential tasks for cyber professionals. (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. Matthew Lucibello)

Data from surveys may be used to make public health decisions at both the installation and the Department of the Army level. This study demonstrates that a vast majority of soldiers were likely sufficiently engaged and answered both bogus items correctly. Future surveys should continue to investigate careless responding to ensure data quality in military populations.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Update: Sexually Transmitted Infections, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2013–2021

Article
5/1/2022
This illustration depicts a 3D computer-generated image of a number of drug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae bacteria. CDC/James Archer

This report summarizes incidence rates of the 5 most common sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among active component service members of the U.S. Armed Forces during 2013–2021. In general, compared to their respective counterparts, younger service members, non-Hispanic Black service members, those who were single and other/unknown marital status, and enlisted service members had higher incidence rates of STIs.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Evaluation of ICD-10-CM-based Case Definitions of Ambulatory Encounters for COVID-19 Among Department of Defense Health Care Beneficiaries

Article
5/1/2022
SEATTLE, WA, UNITED STATES 04.05.2020 U.S. Army Maj. Neil Alcaria is screened at the Seattle Event Center in Wash., April 5. Soldiers from Fort Carson, Colo., and Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Wash. have established an Army field hospital center at the center in support of the Department of Defense COVID-19 response. U.S. Northern Command, through U.S. Army North, is providing military support to the Federal Emergency Management Agency to help communities in need. (U.S. Army photo by Cpl. Rachel Thicklin)

This is the first evaluation of ICD-10-CM-based cased definitions for COVID-19 surveillance among DOD health care beneficiaries. The 3 case definitions ranged from highly specific to a lower specificity, but improved balance between sensitivity and specificity.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Exertional Hyponatremia, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2006–2021

Article
4/1/2022
Marine Corps Cpl. Luis Alicea drinks water after a combat conditioning exercise at Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base New Orleans, May 20, 2019. Photo By: Marine Corps Lance Cpl. Jose Gonzalez.

Exertional (or exercise-associated) hyponatremia refers to a low serum, plasma, or blood sodium concentration (below 135 mEq/L) that develops during or up to 24 hours following prolonged physical activity. Acute hyponatremia creates an osmotic imbalance between fluids outside and inside of cells.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Exertional Heat Illness at Fort Benning, GA: Unique Insights from the Army Heat Center

Article
4/1/2022
Navy Petty Officer 3rd Class Ryan Adams is being used as an example victim for cooling a heat casualty at the bi-annual hot weather standard operating procedure training aboard Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, N.C., Aug. 24. Adams is demonstrating the "burrito" method used to cool a heat related injury victim. Photo by Pfc. Joshua Grant.

Exertional heat illness (hereafter referred to as heat illness) spans a spectrum from relatively mild conditions such as heat cramps and heat exhaustion, to more serious and potentially life-threatening conditions such as heat injury and exertional heat stroke (hereafter heat stroke).

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report
<< < 1 2 3 4 5  ... > >> 
Showing results 1 - 15 Page 1 of 12
Refine your search
Last Updated: August 03, 2022
Follow us on Instagram Follow us on LinkedIn Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on YouTube Sign up on GovDelivery