Skip main navigation

Military Health System

Clear Your Cache

Health.mil has undergone a recent update. For the best user experience we recommend clearing your browser cache.

Correlation Between Mean Temperature and Incidence of Tick-borne Diseases Among Active Duty Service Members in the Contiguous U.S., 2000–2023

Image of 32915004. Evaluating how temperature affects specific tick-borne diseases regionally helps identify protective measures for service members at risk.

Abstract

Medical encounter data and reportable medical events from the Defense Medical Surveillance System were utilized to establish that from 2000 to 2023 there were 2,869 cases of Lyme disease and 175 cases of Rocky Mountain spotted fever among U.S. active component service members within the contiguous U.S. Coincident with a 5.3% (0.63°C) increase in annual mean temperature over the course of the 24-year surveillance period, annual Lyme disease incidence rates increased 35.5% overall, concurrently peaking with mean temperature in 2012 and 2016. After adjusting for annual mean, minimum and maximum temperatures, annual total precipitation, and regional climate, in addition to adjusting for age group, race and ethnicity, sex, and service, incidence rate ratios of both tick-borne diseases did not significantly change with increases in climatic variables. Adjusted incidence rate ratios of both tick-borne diseases increased with increasing age group.

What are the new findings?

Annual Lyme disease incidence rates peaked concurrently with annual mean temperatures. Incidence rate ratios for Lyme disease were highest in the Southeast compared to the Northeast, while Rocky Mountain spotted fever incidence rate ratios were highest in the South compared to the Southeast. Annual Lyme disease and Rocky Mountain spotted fever incidence rates ratios increased with increasing age group.

What is the impact on readiness and force health protection?

Incidence of both Lyme disease and Rocky Mountain spotted fever among U.S. active component service members may increase with worsening global warming. Evaluating how temperature affects these tick-borne diseases regionally helps identify protective measures for service members at risk.

Background

Global warming can facilitate tick-borne disease transmission through improved environmental favorability for ticks, extending their geographic range and periods of activity.1 Given that nearly 1.1 million U.S. active component service members are stationed across the U.S., where several TBDs are endemic, it is crucial to understand how rising temperatures may influence the burden of such diseases.2,3

Evidence for the relationship between temperature and TBD in the U.S. is conflicting. Analysis of Lyme disease cases reported from 2000 to 2017 to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention determined that warming annual temperatures were associated with increasing incidence in the Northeast.4 A separate study used data from high-incidence states during 2000 to 2016 to predict that in subsequent decades, Lyme disease cases will increase by 21%, given the projected 2°C increase in annual mean temperature by mid-century.5 Meanwhile, a study utilizing data from the Kansas, Missouri, Arkansas, and Oklahoma state departments of health determined that average daytime land surface temperature above 35°C was a limiting factor for Rocky Mountain spotted fever incidence from 2005 to 2014.6 In further contrast, within the same surveillance period a cross-sectional study found that temperature was not associated with the presence or abundance of Lyme disease cases in southwest Virginia.7 Research on ACSMs in the eastern U.S. demonstrated a 5.7% increase in Lyme disease from 2006-2012, while another study has shown the Northeast has the highest incidence of Lyme disease from 2004 to 2013.8,9 Considering that minute changes in global warming can lead to considerable fluctuations in TBD burden, additional research must verify the relationship between temperature and TBD incidence, specifically among ACSMs, as there is no available literature on this topic specific to the U.S. Armed Forces.10,11

The objectives of this study were to identify the incidence of the two TBDs most frequently diagnosed within the Military Health System among ACSMs and evaluate the correlation between temperature and incidence of each TBD, to inform pertinent public health professionals on control measures such as improvements to uniform permethrin treatment practices.12,13 Data available to the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division, in conjunction with National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration climatic data, may provide further clarity on the correlation between climate changes and TBD occurrence.

Methods

This study included ACSMs from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2023. Demographic and medical encounter data were obtained from the Defense Medical Surveillance System for confirmed cases of RMSF and Lyme disease acquired in the contiguous U.S. Diagnoses were ascertained from inpatient and outpatient encounter data, and reportable medical events of individuals who received medical care either in the MHS or civilian facilities in the Click to closePurchased CareThe TRICARE Health Program is often referred to as purchased care. It is the services we “purchase” through the managed care support contracts.purchased care system.

Adhering to the AFHSD surveillance case definition for RMSF, a case of RMSF was defined as one confirmed RME of RMSF or spotted fever rickettsiosis.14 Deviating from the AFHSD case definition, laboratory or epidemiological data were not included to confirm a RMSF case. As of January 1, 2010, RMEs of RMSF are expected to be reported as spotted fever rickettsioses, although this study identified RMEs of RMSF reported as RMSF after that date, through to 2017.15 Adhering to the AFHSD surveillance case definition for Lyme disease, a case of Lyme disease was defined as either one confirmed RME of Lyme disease, one inpatient encounter with a qualifying code in any diagnostic position, or two outpatient encounters within 60 days of one another with a qualifying code in any diagnostic position.16 Qualifying codes for Lyme disease were International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision code 088.81, or International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes beginning with A69.2.16

The first qualifying encounter or RME was deemed the incident encounter. ACSMs diagnosed with the TBD of interest before the surveillance period were excluded, and an individual could qualify as a Lyme disease or RMSF case only once. The location in which each TBD was acquired was determined to be the location of the facility in which the incident diagnosis was made. Demographic variables of interest were age, sex, race and ethnicity, service, and grade.

U.S. climate data on mean annual temperature and total annual precipitation were acquired from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.17

The total numbers of each TBD were determined, and overall incidence rates for each TBD were calculated as diagnoses per 100,000 person-years and stratified by age group, sex, race and ethnicity, service, and climate region (referred to as “regional climate” in this paper) as defined by NOAA.17 Annual incidence rates for Lyme disease and RMSF were also calculated as diagnoses per 100,000 p-yrs. The subgroup of each non-ordinal demographic variable with the most incident cases was selected as the reference group for adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs). Poisson regression was used to calculate aIRRs (adjusted for annual mean temperature, annual minimum temperature, annual maximum temperature, annual total precipitation, regional climate, age group, race and ethnicity, sex, and service) and 95% confidence intervals for each TBD. All analyses were conducted using SAS Enterprise Guide (version 8.3).

Results

Among ACSMs in the contiguous U.S. from 2000 through 2023, there were 2,869 Lyme disease cases at a rate of 10.7 per 100,000 p-yrs, and 175 RMSF cases at a rate of 0.7 per 100,000 p-yrs (Table 1). Cases of both TBDs had a mean age of 31.3 years (standard deviation [SD]=8.7, range=18-61) (data not shown).

The highest incidence rates of Lyme disease (52.2 cases per 100,000 p-yrs) occurred in the Northeast while the highest rates of RMSF occurred in Ohio Valley (1.3 cases per 100,000 p-yrs) (Table 1). Lyme disease incidence rates increased with increasing age group, ranging from 7.0 cases per 100,000 p-yrs among ACSMs aged less than 20 years to 19.9 cases per 100,000 p-yrs among those aged 40 or more years (Table 1). Similarly, RMSF incidence rates increased with increasing age group, ranging from 0.4 cases per 100,000 p-yrs among ACSMs aged less than 20 years to 1.0 case per 100,000 p-yrs among those aged 40 or more years (Table 1). Lyme disease and RMSF incidence rates were highest among non-Hispanic White ACSMs, with this racial and ethnic group experiencing 13.0 Lyme disease cases per 100,000 p-yrs and 0.8 RMSF cases per 100,000 p-yrs (Table 1). Women had the highest rates of Lyme disease (14.0 cases per 100,000 p-yrs) while men had slightly higher rates of RMSF than women (0.7 cases per 100,000 p-yrs) (Table 1). Despite the Army having the greatest number of ACSMs compared to all other services, the incidence rates of Lyme disease were highest among Coast Guard members (28.6 cases per 100,000 p-yrs) and incidence rates of RMSF were highest among Marines (1.2 cases per 100,000 p-yrs) (Table 1).2

Overall annual mean temperature increased 5.3% (0.6°C) from 2000 to 2023, hitting a high of 12.9°C in 2012 and a low of 11.3°C in 2008 (Figure 1a). Mean annual temperatures were highest in the South and Southeast (Figure 1a). FIGURE 1a. Overall and Region-specific Annual Mean Temperature, Contiguous U.S., 2000–2023. This graph charts 10 discrete lines on the horizontal, or x-, axis, with nine of the lines each representing a specific geographic region of the United States, and one representing the Overall contiguous United States. The nine specific regions represented are the Northeast, Southeast, South, Ohio Valley, Upper Midwest, Southwest, Northern Rockies and Plains, Northwest, and West. The x axis is divided into 24 units of measure, each representing a calendar year, starting with 2000 and ending with 2023. The y-, or vertical, axis, charts annual mean temperature, measured in Celsius, on a scale of zero through 20.0, in units of two. The South and Southeast are, by far, the regions with the highest annual mean temperatures, generally ranging from 17 to 18 degrees Celsius. Three regions, namely the West, Ohio Valley and Southwest, cluster to form a middle range of annual mean temperatures, generally ranging from 12 to 14 degrees Celsius, with the West the highest of the three regions. The average annual mean temperature for the Overall contiguous United States also falls within this middle range, at the lower end, generally around 12 degrees Celsius. The Ohio Valley demonstrated the greatest variability among these regions, within the two degree overall range. The final four regions, namely the Northeast, Northwest, Upper Midwest and Northern Rockies and Plains, cluster to form the lower range of annual mean temperatures, with greater variability than in the other two clusters, ranging between six and 10 degrees Celsius. The Upper Midwest and Northern Rockies and Plains are at the lower end of this range, but evidence the greatest variability.Overall total annual precipitation increased 4.5% (1.3 in.) over the surveillance period, hitting a high of 34.6 inches in 2018 and a low of 27.5 inches in 2012 (Figure 1b). Total annual precipitation was highest in the Northeast, Southeast, and Ohio Valley (Figure 1b). FIGURE 1b. Overall and Region-specific Annual Total Precipitation, Contiguous U.S., 2000–2023. This graph charts 10 discrete lines on the horizontal, or x-, axis, with nine of the lines each representing a specific geographic region of the United States, and one representing the Overall contiguous United States. The nine specific regions represented are the Northeast, Southeast, South, Ohio Valley, Upper Midwest, Southwest, Northern Rockies and Plains, Northwest, and West. The x axis is divided into 24 units of measure, each representing a calendar year, starting with 2000 and ending with 2023. The y-, or vertical, axis, charts total precipitation, measured in inches, on a scale of zero through 70, in units of 10. With the exception of the Southwest, Northern Rockies and Plains, and Upper Midwest, annual total precipitation shows high degrees of variability from year to year, with the Southwest the most consistent region, with lowest annual total precipitation, ranging between 8 and 18 inches. The Southwest, West, and Northern Rockies and Plains generally receive less than 20 inches of precipitation annually. The other six regions generally receive at least 30 inches of precipitation annually, which represents the average amount for the Overall contiguous United States. Annual precipitation in the Upper Midwest generally exceeds, but only slightly, the contiguous United States average, with the Northwest also generally within the range of 30 inches, but with greater variability. The Southeast generally has the highest annual precipitation, but with a high degree of variability, from a low of just under 40 inches, in 2007, to highest levels at or exceeding 60 inches, in three years. The Ohio Valley and Northeast evince nearly as much precipitation variability as the Southeast, but with 5 to 10 fewer inches of precipitation, on average. The South generally receives precipitation amounts within range of the contiguous United States average, but with sporadic spikes to 40 inches or more.

Lyme disease incidence increased from 80 cases at a rate of 7.5 cases per 100,000 p-yrs in 2000 to 108 cases at a rate of 10.1 cases per 100,000 p-yrs in 2023 (Figures 2, 3a). FIGURE 2. Annual Incidence of Lyme Disease and Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, Active Component Service Members, Contiguous U.S., 2000–2023. This chart presents 24 pairs of vertical bars. The x axis is divided into 24 units of measure, each representing a calendar year, starting with 2000 and ending with 2023. In each pair of bars, one bar represents cases of Lyme disease, and the other represents cases of Rocky Mountain spotted fever. The y-, or vertical, axis, charts the number of incident cases, on a scale of zero through 200, in units of 20. The height of each bar represents the number of incident diagnoses for that condition. Lyme disease cases among active component service members are, by far, much more numerous than cases of Rocky Mountain spotted fever. Cases of Rocky Mountain spotted fever rarely exceed 10 in any year, with the exception of six years; in those six exceptional years incident cases did not exceed 20 in number. In the first seven years of the surveillance period, through 2006, Lyme disease cases each year ranged between approximately 65 and 90. In 2007, however, incident cases rose to approximately 113, and have rarely fallen below that number since. In 2008 incident cases spiked to nearly 165, although declined back to around 110 in 2010, they rose dramatically again over the next two years, reaching their highest-ever number, nearly 190, in 2012. Lyme disease cases registered their second and third highest numbers in 2016 and 2017, around 181 and 170, respectively. In 2018 Lyme cases noticeably declined, however, to around 110 cases, and remained in the 110 to 120 range ever since.FIGURE 3a. Overall Annual Mean Temperature and Crude Annual Incidence Rate of Lyme Disease, Active Component Service Members, Contiguous U.S., 2000–2023. This graph charts four discrete lines on the horizontal, or x-, axis. The x axis is divided into 24 units of measure, each representing a calendar year, starting with 2000 and ending with 2023. Three of the lines along the x axis represent temperature variables: minimum temperature, mean temperature and maximum temperature. The fourth line represents the incidence rate of Lyme disease cases. There are two y-, or vertical, axes: The left axis charts the incidence rate of Lyme disease per 100,000 person-years, on a scale of zero through 20.0, in units of two; the right axis charts mean temperature, measured in Celsius, on a scale of zero through 25.0, in units of five. Minimum, mean and maximum temperatures were relatively stable during the surveillance period. Minimum mean annual temperatures were around five degrees Celsius; annual mean average temperatures were approximately 12 degrees Celsius; and annual maximum average temperatures were approximately 18 degrees Celsius. Lyme disease incidence rates rose dramatically starting in 2008, and fluctuated markedly for the following decade, ranging between and incidence rate of 10 and a peak of around 19 per 100,000 person-years. Incidence rates declined to around 10 per 100,000 person-years in 2018 and remained in that general range thereafter.Over the 24-year surveillance period, the second highest peak in annual Lyme disease incidence rate (16.2 cases per 100,000 p-yrs) coincided with the highest annual mean temperature (12.9°C), highest annual maximum temperature (19.8°C), and lowest annual total precipitation (27.5 in.) (Figures 1b, 3a). The highest annual Lyme disease incidence rate (18.2 cases per 100,000 p-yrs) coincided with the second-highest annual mean temperature (12.7°C), second highest annual maximum temperature (19.3°C), and highest annual minimum temperature (6.2°C) (Figure 3a). As mean temperature increased by 9.9% from 2011 to 2012, Lyme disease rates increased by 24.2%, and as mean temperature increased by 2.3% from 2015 to 2016, rates increased by 41.9% (Figure 3a). RMSF incidence decreased from 16 cases at a rate of 1.5 cases per 100,000 p-yrs in 2000 to 7 cases at a rate of 0.7 cases per 100,000 p-yrs in 2023, (Figures 2, 3b). FIGURE 3b. Annual Mean Temperature and Crude Annual Incidence Rate of Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, Active Component Service Members, Contiguous U.S., 2000–2023. This graph charts four discrete lines on the horizontal, or x-, axis. The x axis is divided into 24 units of measure, each representing a calendar year, starting with 2000 and ending with 2023. Three of the lines along the x axis represent temperature variables: minimum temperature, mean temperature and maximum temperature. The fourth line represents the incidence rate of Rocky Mountain spotted fever cases. There are two y-, or vertical, axes: The left axis charts the incidence rate of Rocky Mountain spotted fever per 100,000 person-years, on a scale of zero through 1.6, in units of two; the right axis charts mean temperature, measured in Celsius, on a scale of zero through 25.0, in units of five. Minimum, mean and maximum temperatures were relatively stable during the surveillance period. Minimum mean annual temperatures were around five degrees Celsius; annual mean average temperatures were approximately 12 degrees Celsius; and annual maximum average temperatures were approximately 18 degrees Celsius. Rocky Mountain spotted fever incidence rates rose dramatically starting in 2007, and fluctuated markedly for the following decade, ranging between 0.09 and 1.49, and incidence rate of 10 and a peak of around 23 per 100,000 person-years. Incidence rates declined to around 18 per 100,000 person-years in 2018 and remained in that general range thereafter.Rates were highest at 1.5 cases per 100,000 p-yrs in 2000 and 2017, followed by 1.1 cases per 100,000 p-yrs in 2012 (Figure 3b). As mean temperature increased by 9.9% from 2011 to 2012, RMSF rates increased by 32.1% (Figure 3b).

Throughout the surveillance period, annual Lyme disease incidence rates were consistently highest in the Northeast and intermittently highest in the Upper Midwest (Figure 4a). FIGURE 4a. Overall and Region-specific Crude Annual Incidence Rates of Lyme Disease, Contiguous U.S., 2000–2023. This graph charts 10 discrete lines on the horizontal, or x-, axis, with nine of the lines each representing a specific geographic region of the United States, and one representing the Overall contiguous United States. The nine specific regions represented are the Northeast, Southeast, South, Ohio Valley, Upper Midwest, Southwest, Northern Rockies and Plains, Northwest, and West. The x axis is divided into 24 units of measure, each representing a calendar year, starting with 2000 and ending with 2023. The y-, or vertical, axis, charts the incident rate, on a scale of zero through 100.0, in units of 10. The Northeast is, by far, the region with the highest incidence rate of Lyme Disease, generally ranging from 25 to 93 per 100,000 person-years. The Upper Midwest and Ohio Valley are the only two regions that periodically exceed the national average incidence rate for Lyme disease, which is generally around 10.0 per 100,000 person-years.There was no clear trend in regional increases in annual RMSF incidence rates, however, the Southeast consistently had relatively high annual incidence rates over the surveillance period (Figure 4b). FIGURE 4b. Overall and Region-specific Crude Annual Incidence Rates of Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, Contiguous U.S., 2000–2023. This graph charts 10 discrete lines on the horizontal, or x-, axis, with nine of the lines each representing a specific geographic region of the United States, and one representing the Overall contiguous United States. The nine specific regions represented are the Northeast, Southeast, South, Ohio Valley, Upper Midwest, Southwest, Northern Rockies and Plains, Northwest, and West. The x axis is divided into 24 units of measure, each representing a calendar year, starting with 2000 and ending with 2023.  The y-, or vertical, axis, charts the incidence rate, on a scale of zero through 4.5, in units of 0.5. Incidence rates for Rocky Mountain spotted fever are highly variable, with no generalizable pattern of incidence. The overall U.S. incidence rate varies between 0.5 and 1.5 per 100,000 person-years. The Southeast region’s incidence rates correspond most closely to the overall U.S. rates, but with slightly higher rates. Generally, the Ohio Valley has the highest periodic incidence rates, exceeding 2.0 per 100,000 person-years for eight years of the surveillance period. In 2017, however, the Northern Rockies and Plains experienced a noteworthy spike, with an incidence rate approaching 4.5 per 100,000 person years, eclipsing the Ohio Valley’s incidence rate of nearly 4.0 that year.There were also noticeable spikes in incidence rates in Ohio Valley during 2005, 2008, 2017, 2020, and 2021 (Figure 4b).

After adjusting for all demographic variables of interest, for every 1°C increase in mean temperature and every 1 inch increase in total precipitation, the incidence rate of Lyme disease did not change (Table 2). For every 1°C increase in annual minimum temperature, the incidence rate ratio of RMSF increased by 20% (aIRR 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.4) (Table 2). For every 1°C increase in annual mean temperature or 1 inch increase in total precipitation, the incidence rate ratio of RMSF did not change (Table 2).

The aIRR of Lyme disease was highest in the Southeast compared to the Northeast at 1.5 (95% CI, 1.3-1.6) (Table 2). When compared to the Southeast, there was no significant increase in aIRR for RMSF by regional climate (Table 2). The aIRRs of both TBDs increased with increasing age group compared to ACSMs less than 20 years of age, ranging from 1.0 (95% CI, 1.0-1.0) among ACSMs aged 20-24 years to 2.3 (95% CI, 2.3-2.4) among those aged 40 years or older for Lyme disease, and ranging from 1.0 (95% CI, 0.9-1.2) among ACSMs aged 20-24 years to 2.6 (95% CI, 2.3-3.0) among those aged 40 years or older for RMSF (Table 2). There was no significant increase in TBDs by race and ethnicity (Table 2). Women had the highest aIRR for Lyme disease compared to males, with this sex group having an aIRRs of 1.5 (95% CI, 1.5-1.5), while there was no significant difference in aIRRs by sex for RMSF (Table 2).

Discussion

This study found that from 2000 to 2023 in the contiguous U.S., Lyme disease incidence rates increased 35.5% among ACSMs alongside a 5.3% (0.6°C) increase in overall annual mean temperature, meaning rates increased by 4.2 cases per 100,000 p-yrs for every 1°C increase in annual mean temperature. The CDC observed a more dramatic Lyme disease rate increase of 200% in the general U.S. population from 2000 to 2022, though it is important to note that in their analysis, suspect and probable cases were included starting in 2008, while this study included only confirmed cases.18

Conversely, RMSF incidence rates decreased 55.7% overall, or by 1.3 cases per 100,000 p-yrs for every 1°C increase in annual mean temperature, among ACSMs over the surveillance period. Although CDC data demonstrated an upward trend in incidence rates of confirmed and probable RMSF cases in the general U.S. population from 2000 to 2007, the proportion of confirmed cases over this period decreased from 15% to 4%.19

During the surveillance period, the highest annual Lyme disease incidence rate (18.2 cases per 100,000 p-yrs) coincided with the second highest annual mean temperature (12.7°C), while the second highest peak in annual Lyme disease incidence rate (16.2 cases per 100,000 p-yrs) coincided with the highest annual mean temperature (12.9°C) and lowest annual total precipitation (27.5 in.). Although previous research supports that increased Lyme disease incidence are correlated with warmer temperatures, the same data suggest that dry conditions reduce activity of the relevant tick vectors, which in turn lowers disease incidence.4

Over the 24-year surveillance period, RMSF incidence rates spiked at 1.1 cases per 100,000 p-yrs during the highest annual mean temperature (12.9°C) and lowest annual total precipitation (27.5 in.). Research has shown that increases in both average relative humidity and daytime land surface temperatures below 35°C increase RMSF incidence.6

Although crude Lyme disease rates were highest in the Northeast, adjusted results show that compared to the Northeast, rate ratios were highest in the Southeast. Although crude RMSF rates were highest in Ohio Valley, adjusted results show that compared to the Southeast, rate ratios were highest in the South. Surveillance of these TBDs has shown Lyme disease incidence rates among ACSMs were highest in the Northeast while spotted fever rickettsioses including RMSF are highly endemic to 5 states, 4 of which are in the South and Southeast.9,20,21

Crude rates as well as adjusted rate ratios of both TBDs increased with increasing age group. Women had 1.5 times the adjusted rate of Lyme disease than men but had an equal adjusted rate of RMSF compared to men. A previous study of ACSMs in the eastern U.S. also found that Lyme disease incidence rates increased with increasing age and women.8 Likewise, a 2000-2007 study of RMSF determined that incidence rates increased with increasing age group and cumulative incidence was higher among men than women.19

Crude rates and adjusted rate ratios were highest in the Coast Guard for Lyme disease and highest in the Marine Corps for RMSF. Many Coast Guard installations are concentrated in the Northeast, where Lyme disease is most incident.20,22 Similarly, one of the largest Marine Corps installations is located in North Carolina, which is a high incidence jurisdiction for RMSF.21,23 Furthermore, the location of Coast Guard and Marine Corps installations in coastal areas may explain the elevated incidence of TBD in each service, as rising sea levels may create environmental conditions that are more conducive to TBD transmission.24,25 Since the DMSS did not receive encounter data from the Coast Guard between 2015 and 2021, it is possible that Lyme disease and RMSF were even more incident in this service.26 Coast Guard combat uniforms are not factory treated with permethrin, which may also contribute to why ACSMs in this service experienced the highest aIRR of Lyme disease compared to Army members, whose combat uniforms are factory treated with permethrin.13

To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the relationship between climatic factors and TBD incidence in ACSMs, with a few limitations. First, the location of disease acquisition was deemed to be the location at which the incident encounter or RME occurred. Due to the range of possible incubation periods for each TBD, individuals may have developed symptoms and sought care in a location inconsistent with the location of infection.27 Therefore, the regional climate associated with ACSMs may be inaccurate. Likewise, the data do not clarify if the disease was acquired during or outside of work, making it difficult to ascertain a true correlation between TBD incidence and military activities. As a result, this may affect the control measures implemented to prevent infection within the Armed Forces as well as their efficacies. Furthermore, this study’s cohort may not include all cases, as Lyme disease and RMSF often present with nonspecific symptoms, which can make them difficult to diagnose.27 Lastly, the analysis does not account for anthropogenic factors such as land cover and host movement, which influence how climate affects TBD incidence.28

Although no significant correlation between temperature and TBD incidence was found, the observed peaks in annual Lyme disease incidence with rising mean temperatures reaffirm patterns in existing literature. Small changes in temperature can have substantial effects on TBD incidence, and these illnesses can reduce force readiness by causing fevers, headaches, and in some instances, neurologic and cardiac conditions.10,27 Further research is needed to explore the temporality of how climatic conditions affect incidence of both Lyme disease and RMSF. This information is essential to understand and improve the management of these illnesses among ACSMs.

Authors’ Affiliation

Defense Health Agency, Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division, Silver Spring, MD: Ms. Denagamage, Dr. Mabila

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Department of Defense nor the U.S. Government.

References

  1. Rossati A. Global warming and its health impact. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2017;8(1):7-20. doi:10.15171/ijoem.2017.963 
  2. Defense Manpower Data Center. DoD Personnel, Workforce Reports & Publications. U.S. Department of Defense. Accessed Dec. 12, 2024. https://dwp.dmdc.osd.mil/dwp/app/dod-data-reports/workforce-reports 
  3. Sathiamoorthi S, Smith WM. The eye and tick-borne disease in the United States. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016;27(6):530-537. doi:10.1097/icu.0000000000000308   
  4. Couper LI, MacDonald AJ, Mordecai EA. Impact of prior and projected climate change on US Lyme disease incidence. Glob Chang Biol. 2021;27(4):738-754. doi:10.1111/gcb.15435 
  5. Dumic I, Severnini E. “Ticking bomb”: the impact of climate change on the incidence of Lyme disease. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2018:5719081. doi:10.1155/2018/5719081 
  6. Raghavan RK, Goodin DG, Neises D, et al. Hierarchical Bayesian spatio-temporal analysis of climatic and socio-economic determinants of Rocky Mountain spotted fever. PloS One. 2016;11(3):e0150180. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150180  
  7. Lantos PM, Tsao J, Janko M, et al. Environmental correlates of Lyme disease emergence in southwest Virginia, 2005-2014. J Med Entomol. 2021;58(4):1680-1685. doi:10.1093/jme/tjab038 
  8. Rossi C, Stromdahl EY, Rohrbeck P, et al. Characterizing the relationship between tick bites and Lyme disease in active component U.S. Armed Forces in the eastern United States. MSMR. 2015;22(3):2-10. 
  9. Hurt L, Dorsey KA. The geographic distribution of incident Lyme disease among active component service members stationed in the continental United States, 2004-2013. MSMR. 2014;21(5):13-15. 
  10. Dantas-Torres F. Climate change, biodiversity, ticks and tick-borne diseases: the butterfly effect. IJP-PAW. 2015;4(3):452-461. doi:10.1016/j.ijppaw.2015.07.001 
  11. Ostfeld RS, Brunner JL. Climate change and Ixodes tickborne diseases of humans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370(1665). doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0051 
  12. Stidham RA, Cole R, Mabila SL. The four most frequently diagnosed vector-borne diseases among service member and non-service member beneficiaries in the geographic combatant commands, 2010-2022. MSMR. 2024;31(1):14-16. 
  13. Defense Health Agency. DoD Insect Repellent System. U.S. Dept. of Defense. Accessed Feb. 25, 2025. https://ph.health.mil/topics/entomology/pur/pages/dod-insect-repellent-system.aspx#:~:text=the%20army/air%20force%20advanced,been%20treated%20with%20insect%20repellent 
  14. Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division. Rickettsial Diseases (Rickettsioses). Defense Health Agency, U.S. Dept. of Defense. Accessed Dec. 13, 2024. https://www.health.mil/referencecenter/publications/2019/09/01/rickettsial-diseases 
  15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Data and Statistics on Spotted Fever Rickettsiosis. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. Accessed Dec. 13, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/rocky-mountain-spotted-fever/data-research/facts-stats/index.html#:~:text=as%20of%20january%201%2c%202010,spotted%20fever%20rickettsiosis%20(sfr) 
  16. Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division. Lyme Disease. Defense Health Agency, U.S. Dept. of Defense. Accessed Dec. 13, 2024. https://www.health.mil/reference-center/publications/2014/04/01/lyme-disease 
  17. National Centers for Environmental Information. Climate at a Glance: Regional Mapping. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Dept. of Commerce. Accessed Dec. 11, 2024. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/climate-at-a-glance/regional/mapping 
  18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Lyme Disease Surveillance Data. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. Accessed Dec. 13, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/data-research/facts-stats/surveillance-data-1.html 
  19. Openshaw JJ, Swerdlow DL, Krebs JW, et al. Rocky Mountain spotted fever in the United States, 2000-2007: interpreting contemporary increases in incidence. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;83(1):174-182. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0752 
  20. Rowan S, Mohseni N, Chang M, et al. From tick to test: a comprehensive review of tick-borne disease diagnostics and surveillance methods in the United States. Life (Basel). 2023;13(10):2048. doi:10.3390/life13102048 
  21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Clinical Overview of Transmission and Epidemiology. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. Accessed Dec. 30, 2024. https://cdc.gov/rocky-mountain-spotted-fever/hcp/clinical-overview/index.html 
  22. United States Coast Guard. Force Laydown. U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security. Accessed Feb. 25, 2025. https://www.uscg.mil/about/force-laydown 
  23. Department of Military and Veterans Affairs. Military Bases in North Carolina. State of North Carolina. Accessed Feb. 25, 2025. https://www.milvets.nc.gov/benefits-services/military-bases-north-carolina 
  24. U.S. Coast Guard. 2017 United States Coast Guard Sectors Map. U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security. Accessed Oct. 24, 2024. https://homeport.uscg.mil/pages/sector-map.aspx 
  25. Ramasamy R, Surendran SN. Possible impact of rising sea levels on vector-borne infectious diseases. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11:18. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-11-18 
  26. Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. Hospitalizations among members of the active component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2015. MSMR. 2016;23(4):8-16. 
  27. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Yellow Book 2024: Health Information for International Travel. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. Accessed Dec. 1, 2024. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/page/yellowbook-home 
  28. Vonesch N, D’Ovidio MC, Melis P, et al. Climate change, vector-borne diseases and working population. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2016;52(3):397-405. doi:10.4415/ann_16_03_11

You also may be interested in...

Topic
Apr 30, 2025

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

The Medical Surveillance Monthly Report, a peer-reviewed journal launched in 1995, is the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division's flagship publication. The MSMR provides monthly evidence-based estimates of the incidence, distribution, impact, and trends of health-related conditions among service members.

Article
Apr 25, 2025

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report "30th Anniversary" Issue Celebrates a Milestone

MSMR 30th anniversary issue celebrates a milestone

This year marks a significant milestone for the Medical Surveillance Monthly Report as we celebrate its 30th anniversary. Throughout its three decades, MSMR has continuously improved its content with the goal of providing readers with unbiased, scientifically rigorous, evidence-based medical surveillance information on the current status, trends, ...

Article
Apr 1, 2025

Guest Editorial: The Department of Defense Global Respiratory Pathogen Surveillance Program: Its Impact on Public Health, from the U.S. Armed Forces to Global Health

This editorial discusses the U.S. Department of Defense Global Respiratory Pathogen Surveillance Program, a cornerstone of U.S. Department of Defense respiratory disease surveillance, and its surveillance network of 115 active sentinel sites in addition to other participating sites, deployed locations, and partner laboratories across the globe.

Skip subpage navigation
Refine your search
Last Updated: March 28, 2025
Follow us on Instagram Follow us on LinkedIn Follow us on Facebook Follow us on X Follow us on YouTube Subscribe to updates from the MHS