Need larger text?

Guest Editorial: Optimizing Female Warfighter Health and Performance in Environmental Extremes

Image of 78853023. The U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine and many academic laboratories and research teams have recently increased focus on the female warfighter.

5/1/2025 By: Gabrielle E. W. Giersch, PhD; Karleigh E. Bradbury, PhD; Nisha Charkoudian, PhD

Share this page

Social Media Links

The ongoing non-combat threats of extreme environmental exposure—including heat, cold, high altitudes, and subterranean areas—have always been important focuses for research and development of effective countermeasures, both within the military as well as other domains requiring prolonged outdoor activity. Over the past decade, the increased frequency of weather phenomena associated with climate change—such as extreme heat waves, violent storms, catastrophic flooding—have brought the biomedical risks and gaps in knowledge associated with extreme environmental exposure into sharper focus, both in the biomedical literature and mainstream media.1,2

In military medicine, threats due to environmental exposure are particularly relevant, as small units and dismounted warfighters are often directly exposed to a given set of extreme environmental conditions. Until the past decade, much of the military medical literature on environmental stressors relied on data collected primarily from men. With women representing a growing percentage of the military force, both in the U.S. and around the world, it is increasingly necessary to understand the physiological and pathophysiological responses of both sexes for optimizing the health of all warfighters, in mission-critical scenarios as well as training.

The environmental physiology community, including the U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine and many academic laboratories and research teams, have recently increased focus on the female warfighter, to improve knowledge and awareness of individualized risk management for individuals exposed to extreme terrestrial environments.3-8 This editorial provides an update on the state of the science to aid military medical providers’ understanding of where and when sex-specific considerations in environmental exposure risk are necessary and—equally importantly—are not.

Threats of Extreme Environmental Exposure

Heat Stress

Heat-related illnesses remain a major threat to warfighters, with 2,000 or more individuals each year experiencing mild forms of heat illness, and approximately 500 individuals experiencing exertional heat stroke, which is the most severe, and potentially fatal, heat illness. It was previously assumed that women are at an increased risk for heat-related illnesses compared to their male counterparts,9,10 without appropriate evidence.

Recently, the Thermal and Mountain Medicine Division of USARIEM evaluated epidemiological data, using a case-control analysis, from an Army-wide analysis of EHS, the most severe form of heat illness, and found no differences in risk of EHS between men and women.11,12 While sex-related differences for EHS risk are not apparent, recent evidence suggests potential differences in organ damage between men and women following EHS. In a cohort of EHS cases from Fort Benning, the Thermal and Mountain Medicine Division of USARIEM also found that biomarkers of end organ damage were lower in women compared to men, despite similar highest recorded body temperatures.13 This may suggest that women suffer less damage than men from EHS of similar severity, but more research is needed to fully elucidate physiological mechanisms to support that hypothesis.

Risk for developing other less severe, heat-related illnesses has recently been evaluated. Kazman et al. (2024) reported an increased risk for “mild” heat illness (i.e., heat exhaustion) in recruits,14 but more research to elucidate the mechanism for this potential difference is warranted. In the yearly heat illness active updates from MSMR, men and women consistently demonstrate similar rates of reported heat exhaustion, including heat injury (diagnosed as heat exhaustion with evidence of end organ damage).

While risk of heat-related illness does not appear to be affected by sex, relatively low-impact differences in thermoregulation between men and women exist. Namely, and likely the most effective, are the physical differences between men and women, where women are, on average, smaller with larger body surface area to mass ration (BSA:mass-1), which can enhance heat dissipation in some environments.15 This may provide women with a relative advantage in certain situations where heat dissipation is not impeded by clothing or the surrounding environment. Situations in which heat dissipation capacity is impeded, or work rate is very high (i.e., load carriage occurs), instead could turn women’s BSA:mass-1 into a disadvantage; lower lean body mass carrying an absolute load in clothing with less evaporative capacity leads to greater thermal stress. Additionally, there is evidence to suggest lower sweating rate in women at very high work loads,16,17 which may affect military personnel when performing ruck marches or runs, but also may not yield significant differences in total heat loss or core temperature responses, despite less sweat produced.18

Female sex hormones also have pronounced effects on the thermoregulatory system, as previously thoroughly described,19 but those hormonal or menstrual cycle differences do not seem to affect body temperature following exercise, when evaluated in a meta-analysis.20 Contraceptive status did appear to influence esophageal temperature during exercise,21 with Click to closeProgestinA form of progesterone; the hormone that plays a role in the menstrual cycle and pregnancy progestin-only contraceptive users experiencing higher core temperatures at baseline and throughout exercise, which may suggest that type of contraceptive influences thermoregulatory response in women.

Besides physiological differences, there are also well-described behavioral differences in thermoregulation between men and women, including pacing22 and behavioral thermoregulation.23 Behavioral mechanisms may be more effective than physiological mechanisms for thermoregulation24 and should be considered for future research in addition to practical prevention strategies.

Cold Stress

Female-specific responses during cold stress are less well-understood. Female sex hormones and cold stress responses have been thoroughly reviewed,7 with findings indicating that estradiol may enhance cutaneous vasodilatory responses25-27 and progesterone observed to shift the core temperature threshold to higher temperatures,25,28 which may affect shivering onset and sensitivity29,30 (although that finding varies in the literature,31 without consistent methodologies in reported investigations). Interestingly, if elevated progesterone concentrations, like those observed in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle, do influence shivering onset, it is likely such effect is due to elevated core temperatures observed with high progesterone and would not influence risk of injury, impaired performance, nor loss of dexterity during cold stress.

Manual dexterity decreases with cold stress, and cold-induced vasodilation, a reflex that opens the blood vessels to the extremities to provide blood flow, likely occurs to prevent freezing cold injuries.32 Women have been shown to have lower finger temperatures than men, with no differences in cold-induced vasodilation or dexterity measures between sexes,33 but sex hormones were not evaluated systematically in that investigation.

The impacts of estradiol and progesterone, particularly with fluctuations that occur not only during the menstrual cycle, but throughout reproductive lifespan as well as with contraceptive use, require further investigation.

Women do appear to have a greater prevalence of Raynaud’s phenomenon,34,35 but there is currently not evidence to suggest specific influence of female sex hormones or menstrual cycle phases on Raynaud’s prevalence or severity.36 Raynaud’s phenomenon may pose an increased risk in developing freezing cold injuries such as frostbite.37

The physical differences that largely govern differences between men and women in heat stress may also affect cold stress, with greater subcutaneous fat potentially providing insulation in women38 and greater average BSA:mass-1 potentially increasing heat loss in cold environments. It is unclear if these physical differences influence risk of injury or decreased performance during cold stress.

High Altitude Stress

It is well-established that humans experience myriad physiological responses upon exposure to high terrestrial altitude due to associated decrease in partial pressure of oxygen (PO2).39 The decrease in PO2 is the primary cause of the decrements in both physical and cognitive performance40 that occur with altitude exposure.

Both acute and chronic responses to hypoxia occur with a primary goal of increasing oxygen delivery throughout the body. Acute responses include, but are not limited to, increases in heart rate, ventilation, diuresis, and sympathetic nervous system activity.3,41 Longer-term adaptations, known as acclimatization, include increases in hemoglobin mass, alterations in substrate utilization (e.g., enhanced carbohydrate metabolism), and improvements in capillary O2 extraction.40 The current literature presents some sex differences in physiological variables such as ventilation and hemoglobin mass at sea level baseline, but these differences do not appear to influence acute physiological responses to altitude nor the process of acclimatization in women.41

Ventilation has been shown to be influenced by sex and female sex hormones.42 Progesterone is a ventilatory stimulant that acts on both the peripheral and central chemoreceptors to increase ventilation41 and, concomitantly, lower partial pressures of end tidal CO2. Higher ventilation and lower PETCO2 have been reported in women in comparison to men, as well as during the luteal versus follicular phase of the menstrual cycle.43 Despite the presence of progesterone, there are no sex differences in the acute hypoxic ventilatory response43 or in the time course of ventilatory acclimatization.44

One potential limitation for females at altitude is an increased work of breathing. Women experience increased work of breathing compared to men, even when corrected for body and lung size,45 a result of smaller airways that increase air flow resistance during ventilation.46 This physiological difference between sexes may be of particular importance during load carriage at altitude, when increased work of breathing intensifies due to increased thoracic resistance caused by the external load.

Increased work of breathing for a specific ventilation is caused by elevated oxygen demand and greater respiratory muscle use.47,48 In situations when respiratory muscle metabolic rates are increased, blood flow is redistributed to the diaphragm and other respiratory muscles because of increased sympathetic nerve activity, concomitant with vasoconstriction to blood vessels of other active or inactive muscles (i.e., respiratory muscle metaboreflex). Recent work has demonstrated attenuated sympathetic responses in women to increases in inspiratory muscle work, both at rest49 and during exercise,50 but these implications of these findings for blood flow redistribution during high levels of respiratory muscle work (i.e., during load carriage at altitude), and whether women are at a disadvantage due to increased work of breathing, are unknown.51,52

High altitude illness is an important risk consideration for those ascending in altitude. The most common high altitude illness is acute mountain sickness, which occurs when individuals rapidly ascend to altitudes to 2,500 meters or higher, with symptom prevalence and severity increasing with higher elevations.53,54 Symptoms of AMS often include nausea, dizziness, fatigue, headache, and gastrointestinal distress. Other, but less common, altitude-associated illnesses include high altitude cerebral and pulmonary edemas. One formative study reported that men may be more likely to develop AMS,55 but other reports suggest that women may be at a greater risk56—or that there are no differences between the sexes.53 Additional research to investigate potential sex differences in high altitude illness risk, while also exploring potential mechanisms, are needed.

Subterranean and Hypercapnic Environments

Environments with elevated levels of carbon dioxide, which can result in hypercapnia, are an environmental stressor that recently has gained interest in the military community, after relatively little research. In normal ambient air, the concentration of carbon dioxide is very low (~0.034%), but in certain situations such as subterranean environments (including underground tunnels and buildings),57 or when individuals are wearing personal protective equipment,58 CO2 concentration can be as high as 7%.59 Small increases in ambient CO2 can cause symptoms such as decreased focus, fatigue, and weakness, as well as increased levels of anxiety, but higher concentrations (10-15%) can lead to unconsciousness and suffocation within minutes of exposure, with further increases resulting in death.60

Similar to hypoxia, hypercapnia triggers a robust ventilatory response.61,62 Several investigations have sought to distinguish sex differences during ventilatory response to increased CO2, known as hypercapnic ventilatory response. Some investigations have reported a greater HCVR in men, but when corrected for body size—including body mass index, body surface area, and lung size—those differences no longer exist.63,64 While HCVR appears to be similar in both sexes, the ventilatory threshold for increase in ventilation is lower in women.65

Previous studies have explored the influence of increased CO2 on both physical59 and cognitive performance,66 but those studies included few women. Sex differences in physiological responses to increased CO2 remains to be investigated.

Editorial Comment

With the increased proportional and absolute numbers of women in the U.S. military, it is vital to better understand female physiological responses to, and unique requirements for, environmental extremes. Continued research should seek to investigate these potential sex differences to ensure suitable policy recommendations for both women and men in uniform.

Authors’ Affiliation

Thermal and Mountain Medicine Division, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA

Disclaimer

The views, opinions, and findings in this article are those of the authors and should not be construed as an official position nor decision of the U.S. Department of the Army, unless so designated by other official documentation. Citations of any commercial organizations or trade names in this report do not constitute official Department of the Army endorsement nor approval of the products or services of these organizations.

References

  1. Hannan FM, Leow MK, Lee JK, et al. Endocrine effects of heat exposure and relevance to climate change. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2024;20(11):673-684. doi:10.1038/s41574-024-01017-4 
  2. Pinho-Gomes A, Mcintosh A, Woodward M. Sex differences in mortality associated with heatwaves: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Public Health. 2024;34(suppl 3):ckae144.283. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.283 
  3. Giersch GEW, Charkoudian N, McClung HL. The rise of the female warfighter: physiology, performance, and future directions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022;54(4):683-691. doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000002840 
  4. de Jonge XJ, Thompson B, Han A. Methodological recommendations for menstrual cycle research in sports and exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(12):2610-2617. doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000002073 
  5. Sims ST, Heather AK. Myths and Methodologies: Reducing scientific design ambiguity in studies comparing sexes and/or menstrual cycle phases. Exp Physiol. 2018;103(10):1309-1317. doi:10.1113/ep086797 
  6. Stachenfeld NS, Taylor HS. Challenges and methodology for testing young healthy women in physiological studies. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014;306(8):e849-e853. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00038.2014 
  7. Greenfield AM, Charkoudian N, Alba BK. Influences of ovarian hormones on physiological responses to cold in women. Temperature (Austin). 2022;9(1):23-45. doi:10.1080/23328940.2021.1953688 
  8. Hutchins KP, Borg DN, Bach AJ, et al. Female (under) representation in exercise thermoregulation research. Sports Med Open. 2021;7(1):43. doi:10.1186/s40798-021-00334-6 
  9. Alele F, Malau-Aduli B, Malau-Aduli A, Crowe M. Systematic review of gender differences in the epidemiology and risk factors of exertional heat illness and heat tolerance in the armed forces. BMJ Open. 2020;10(4):e031825. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031825 
  10. Carter R, Cheuvront SN, Williams JO, et al. Epidemiology of hospitalizations and deaths from heat illness in soldiers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(8):1338-1334. doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000174895.19639.ed 
  11. Giersch GE, Taylor KM, Caldwell AR, Charkoudian N. Body mass index, but not sex, influences exertional heat stroke risk in young healthy men and women. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2023;324(1):r15-r19. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00168.2022 
  12. Taylor KM, Giersch GE, Caldwell AR, Epstein Y, Charkoudian N. Relation of body surface area-to-mass ratio to risk of exertional heat stroke in healthy men and women. J Appl Physiol. 2024;136(3):549-554. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00597.2023 
  13. Goodwin KC, Giersch GE, Murray TA, DeGroot DW, Charkoudian N. Sex differences in biomarkers of end-organ damage following exertional heat stroke in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2024;137(5):1434-1445. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00597.2023 
  14. Kazman JB, Nelson DA, Ahmed AE, et al. Risk for exertional heat illness among US army enlistees: climate indexes, intrinsic factors and their interactions. BJSM. 2024;59(4). doi:10.1136/bjsports-2024-108441 
  15. Cramer MN, Jay O. Biophysical aspects of human thermoregulation during heat stress. Auton Neurosci. 2016;196:3-13. doi:10.1016/j.autneu.2016.03.001 
  16. Gagnon D, Crandall CG, Kenny GP. Sex differences in postsynaptic sweating and cutaneous vasodilation. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2013;114(3):394-401. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00877.2012 
  17. Gagnon D, Kenny GP. Sex modulates whole-body sudomotor thermosensitivity during exercise. J Physiol. 2011;589(pt 24):6205-6217. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2011.219220 
  18. Gagnon D, Jay O, Lemire B, Kenny GP. Sex-related differences in evaporative heat loss: the importance of metabolic heat production. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008;104(5):821-829. doi:10.1007/s00421-008-0837-0 
  19. Charkoudian N, Stachenfeld NS. Reproductive hormone influences on thermoregulation in women. Compr Physiol. 2014;4(2):793-804. doi:10.1002/cphy.c130029 
  20. Giersch GEW, Morrissey MC, Katch RK, et al. Menstrual cycle and thermoregulation during exercise in the heat: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2020;23(12):1134-1140. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2020.05.014 
  21. Stachenfeld NS, Silva C, Keefe DL. Click to closeestrogenAny of a group of steroid hormones which promote the development and maintenance of female characteristics of the body. Such hormones are also produced artificially for use in oral contraceptives or to treat menopausal and menstrual disorders.Estrogen modifies the temperature effects of progesterone. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000;88(5):1643-1649. doi:10.1152/jappl.2000.88.5.1643 
  22. Millard-Stafford M, Sparling PB, Rosskopf LB, et al. Fluid intake in male and female runners during a 40-km field run in the heat. J Sports Sci. 1995;13(3):257-263. doi:10.1080/02640419508732235 
  23. Vargas NT, Chapman CL, Sackett JR, et al. Thermal behavior differs between males and females during exercise and recovery. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(1):141-152. doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000001756 
  24. Flouris AD, Schlader ZJ. Human behavioral thermoregulation during exercise in the heat. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25:52-64. doi:10.1111/sms.12349 
  25. Kolka MA, Stephenson LA. Interaction of menstrual cycle phase, clothing resistance, and exercise on thermoregulation in women. J Therm Biol. 1997;22(2):137-141. doi:10.1016/S0306-4565(97)00003-x 
  26. Charkoudian N, Johnson JM. Altered reflex control of cutaneous circulation by female sex steroids is independent of prostaglandins. Am J Physiol. 1999;276(5):h1634-h1640. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.1999.276.5.H1634 
  27. Shoemaker LN, Haigh KM, Kuczmarski AV, et al. ETB receptor-mediated vasodilation is regulated by estradiol in young women. Am J Physiol Heart Cir Physiol. 2021;321(3):h592-h598. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00087.2021 
  28. Kolka MA, Stephenson LA. Resetting the thermoregulatory set-point by endogenous estradiol or progesterone in women. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997;813:204-206. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb51694.x 
  29. Hessemer V, Bruck K. Influence of menstrual cycle on thermoregulatory, metabolic, and heart rate responses to exercise at night. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1985;59(6):1911-1917. doi:10.1152/jappl.1985.59.6.1911 
  30. Gonzalez RR, Blanchard LA. Thermoregulatory responses to cold transients: effects of menstrual cycle in resting women. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998;85(2):543-553. doi:10.1152/jappl.1998.85.2.543 
  31. Blondin DP, Maneshi A, Imbeault MA, Haman F. Effects of the menstrual cycle on muscle recruitment and oxidative fuel selection during cold exposure. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011;111(4):1014-1020. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00293.2011 
  32. Cheung SS. Responses of the hands and feet to cold exposure. Temperature (Austin). 2015;2(1):105-120. doi:10.1080/23328940.2015.1008890 
  33. Reading J, Roberts D, Prusaczyk W. Gender Differences in Finger Temperatures During Cold Air Exposure. Citeseer;1997.
  34. Suter LG, Murabito JM, Felson DT, Fraenkel L. The incidence and natural history of Raynaud's phenomenon in the community. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(4):1259-1263. doi:10.1002/art.20988 
  35. Gifford RW, Hines EA. Raynaud's disease among women and girls. Circulation. 1957;16(6):1012-1021. doi:10.1161/01.cir.16.6.1012 
  36. Bartelink MEL. Vasospasm and Female Sex Hormones: Studies in Raynaud's Phenomenon and Migraine. Dissertation. Catholic University Nijmegen;1992.
  37. Hamlet M. Peripheral cold injury. Arbete Och Halsa Vetenskaplig Skriftserie. 1998:127-131.
  38. Burse RL. Sex differences in human thermoregulatory response to heat and cold stress. Hum Factors. 1979;21(6):687-99. doi:10.1177/001872087912210606 
  39. West JB. Human responses to extreme altitudes. Integr Comp Biol. 2006;46(1):25-34. doi:10.1093/icb/icj005 
  40. Department of the Army. Technical Bulletin (TB MED 505): Altitude Acclimatization and Illness Management. U.S. Dept. of Defense. 2010. 
  41. Raberin A, Burtscher J, Citherlet T, et al. Women at altitude: sex-related physiological responses to exercise in hypoxia. Sports Med. 2024;54(2):271-287. doi:10.1007/s40279-023-01954-6 
  42. Gargaglioni LH, Marques DA, Patrone LGA. Sex differences in breathing. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2019;238:110543. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2019.110543 
  43. MacNutt MJ, Laursen PB, Kedia S, et al. Acclimatisation in trekkers with and without recent exposure to high altitude. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112:3287-3294. doi:10.1007/s00421-012-2308-x 
  44. Muza SR, Rock PB, Fulco CS, et al. Women at altitude: ventilatory acclimatization at 4,300 m. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001;91(4):1791-1799. doi:10.1152/jappl.2001.91.4.1791 
  45. LoMauro A, Aliverti A. Sex and gender in respiratory physiology. Eur Respir Rev. 2021;30(162):210038. doi:10.1183/16000617.0038-2021 
  46. Dominelli PB, Ripoll JG, Cross TJ, et al. Sex differences in large conducting airway anatomy. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018;125(3):960-965. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00440.2018 
  47. Faghy MA, Shei RJ, Armstrong NC, White M, Lomax M. Physiological impact of load carriage exercise: current understanding and future research directions. Physiol Rep. 2022;10(21):e15502. doi:10.14814/phy2.15502 
  48. Sheel AW, Guenette JA. Mechanics of breathing during exercise in men and women: sex versus body size differences? Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2008;36(3):128-134. doi:10.1097/jes.0b013e31817be7f0 
  49. Leahy MG, Kipp S, Benbaruj JM, et al. Effects of sex and ageing on the human respiratory muscle metaboreflex. J Physiol. 2023;601(3):689-702. doi:10.1113/jp283838 
  50. Katayama K, Smith JR, Goto K, et al. Elevated sympathetic vasomotor outflow in response to increased inspiratory muscle activity during exercise is less in young women compared with men. Exp Physiol. 2018;103(4):570-580. doi:10.1113/ep086817 
  51. Archiza B, Reinhard PA, Welch JF, Sheel AW. Sex differences in diaphragmatic fatigue: effects of hypoxia during inspiratory loading. J Physiol. 2021;599(4):1319-1333. doi:10.1113/jp280704 
  52. Archiza B, Leahy MG, Kipp S, Sheel AW. An integrative approach to the pulmonary physiology of exercise: when does biological sex matter? Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021;121(9):2377-2391. doi:10.1007/s00421-021-04690-9 
  53. Derstine M, Jean D, Beidleman BA, et al. Acute mountain sickness and high altitude cerebral edema in women: a scoping review–UIAA Medical Commission recommendations. High Alt Med Biol. 2023;24(4):259-267. doi:10.1089/ham.2023.0043 
  54. Roach RC, Hackett PH, Oelz O, et al. The 2018 Lake Louise Acute Mountain Sickness Score. High Alt Med Biol. 2018;19(1):4-6. doi:10.1089/ham.2017.0164 
  55. Beidleman BA, Tighiouart H, Schmid CH, Fulco CS, Muza SR. Predictive models of acute mountain sickness after rapid ascent to various altitudes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(4):792-800. doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e31827989ec 
  56. Hou YP, Wu JL, Tan C, et al. Sex-based differences in the prevalence of acute mountain sickness: a meta-analysis. Mil Med Res. 2019;6(1):38. doi:10.1186/s40779-019-0228-3 
  57. Monsé C, Broding HC, Sucker K, et al. Exposure assessment of potash miners at elevated CO2 levels. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014;87:413-421. doi:10.1007/s00420-013-0880-y 
  58. Smith CL, Whitelaw JL, Davies B. Carbon dioxide rebreathing in respiratory protective devices: influence of speech and work rate in full-face masks. Ergonomics. 2013;56(5):781-790. doi:10.1080/00140139.2013.777128 
  59. Ryan BJ, Seeley AD, Pitsas DM, et al. Influence of graded hypercapnia on endurance exercise performance in healthy humans. Am J Physiol Regul, Integr Comp Physiol. 2022;323(5):r638-r647. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00132.2022 
  60. Headquarters DotA. Subterranean Operations. Vol. 3-12.51. Army Technique Publications. Nov. 1, 2019. 
  61. Asmussen E, Nielsen M. Ventilatory response to CO2 during work at normal and at low oxygen tensions. Acta Physiol Scand. 1957;39(1):27-35. doi:10.1111/j.1748-1716.1957.tb01406.x 
  62. Ogoh S, Hayashi N, Inagaki M, Ainslie PN, Miyamoto T. Interaction between the ventilatory and cerebrovascular responses to hypo- and hypercapnia at rest and during exercise. J Physiol. 2008;586(17):4327-4338. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2008.157073 
  63. Jensen D, Wolfe LA, O'Donnell DE, Davies GA. Chemoreflex control of breathing during wakefulness in healthy men and women. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005;98(3):822-828. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01208.2003 
  64. Goldberg S, Ollila HM, Lin L, et al. Analysis of hypoxic and hypercapnic ventilatory response in healthy volunteers. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0168930. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0168930 
  65. MacNutt MJ, De Souza MJ, Tomczak SE, Homer JL, Sheel AW. Resting and exercise ventilatory chemosensitivity across the menstrual cycle. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012;112(5):737-747. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00727.2011 
  66. Gill M, Natoli MJ, Vacchiano C, et al. Effects of elevated oxygen and carbon dioxide partial pressures on respiratory function and cognitive performance. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014;117(4):406-412. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00995.2013

You also may be interested in...

Topic
Jul 1, 2025

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

The Medical Surveillance Monthly Report, a peer-reviewed journal launched in 1995, is the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division's flagship publication. The MSMR provides monthly evidence-based estimates of the incidence, distribution, impact, and trends of health-related conditions among service members.

Article
Jun 1, 2025

Letter to the Editor

This letter to the editor addresses the methodology from the article Correlation Between Mean Temperature and Incidence of Tick-borne Diseases Among Active Duty Service Members in the Contiguous U.S., 2000-2023, published in the March 2025 issue of MSMR.

Recommended Content Medical Surveillance Monthly Report
Article
May 1, 2025

Update: Infertility Among Active Component Service Women, U.S. Armed Forces, 2019–2023

This update of infertility surveillance, analysis and reporting provides more recent estimates of infertility diagnosis incidence and prevalence of among active component U.S. service women. MSMR has published the incidence and prevalence of diagnosed female infertility among active component women since 2000, with assessments of annual rates of ...

Recommended Content Medical Surveillance Monthly Report
Article
May 1, 2025

Trends of Sepsis Hospitalizations Among Female Active Component U.S. Service Members, 2011–2022

This report on sepsis hospitalizations among service women is in response to studies of sepsis among active component U.S. military members that have shown markedly increased rates of sepsis hospitalizations, especially among women, among whom rates are higher than male service members as well as the general U.S. population.

Recommended Content Medical Surveillance Monthly Report
Skip subpage navigation
Refine your search